Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ENVA vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
ENVA vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $834M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.15B | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $327M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.5% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 26.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.56B | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $104M |
ENVA vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1196.3 | +1096.3% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 62.7 | -37.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ENVA vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ENVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.48
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.1% 10Y total return vs PRAA's -30.6%
In this particular matchup, PRAA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% NII/revenue growth vs PRAA's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 26.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.9% vs PRAA's +11.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% |
ENVA vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ENVA vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.5x PRAA's $1.2B. ENVA is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $815M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $327M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PRAA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENVA's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $834M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $762M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.62x | -2.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.30x | 26.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.15x | 1.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.34x | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENVA scores 6/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.9% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.41x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 79.01x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $48,228 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,444 for PRAA. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +80.9% total return vs PRAA's +11.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 57.5% vs PRAA's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.9% | +11.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +290.9% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.3% | -45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2010.7% | -30.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.5% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ENVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENVA is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $176.68 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $89.00 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 452K |
Analyst Outlook
PRAA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ENVA as "Buy" and PRAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.6% upside for PRAA (target: $26) vs 17.9% for ENVA (target: $200).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $199.50 | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | +2.4% |
PRAA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENVA leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
ENVA vs PRAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ENVA or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ENVA or PRAA?
On forward P/E, Enova International, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ENVA or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +382. 3%, compared to -45. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 1% versus PRAA's -30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ENVA or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 23% more volatile than ENVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ENVA or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus 10. 4% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enova International, Inc. grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ENVA or PRAA?
Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 8% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAA leads at 33. 9% versus 23. 5% for ENVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ENVA or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for PRA Group, Inc. — 16. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAA: 21. 6% to $26. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ENVA or PRAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ENVA or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENVA: +20. 1%, PRAA: -30. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ENVA and PRAA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.