FA vs HRI vs EFX

For growth investors, First Advantage Corporation (FA) is the stronger pick with 83.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Equifax Inc. (EFX). Equifax Inc. (EFX) offers the better valuation at 32. 6x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Advantage Corporation (FA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Equifax Inc.

(EFX) is the cheapest at 32. 6x versus Herc Holdings Inc. at 4250. 3x. On forward P/E, First Advantage Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Herc Holdings Inc.

(HRI) delivered a total return of +33. 3%, compared to -27. 1% for First Advantage Corporation (FA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRI returned +446. 3% versus FA's -27. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equifax Inc.

(EFX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Herc Holdings Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning HRI is approximately 132% more volatile than EFX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Advantage Corporation (FA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Herc Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Advantage Corporation (FA) is pulling ahead at 83.

0% versus 6. 9% for Equifax Inc. (EFX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Advantage Corporation grew EPS 73. 0% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Herc Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FA leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Equifax Inc.

(EFX) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 9% net margin versus -2. 2% for First Advantage Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EFX leads at 18. 0% versus 8. 4% for FA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EFX leads at 44. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, First Advantage Corporation (FA) trades at 10.

7x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Herc Holdings Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRI: 34. 8% to $183. 40.

In this comparison, HRI (2.

0% yield), EFX (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Equifax Inc.

(EFX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EFX: +57. 7%, FA: -27. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; EFX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HRI, EFX pay a dividend while FA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.