Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBP vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBP vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.78B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $345M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 72.9% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $185M |
FBP vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 443.9 | +343.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBP vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs NBTB's 1.54
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3% | |
| Value | PEG 0.30 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FBP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FBP vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBP vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBP and NBTB operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $867M in trailing revenue. FBP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBTB's 19.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $345M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $440M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.9% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FBP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 17% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs NBTB's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.29x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.97x | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.37x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.01x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.71x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBP's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs NBTB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$293M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $20,624 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,950 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, FBP leads with a +25.0% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBP at 33.8% vs NBTB's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.6% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +640.3% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.8% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBP is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.57 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBP as "Buy" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for FBP (target: $26) vs 1.8% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs FBP's 2.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.4% |
FBP leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
FBP vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBP or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBP or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.
(FBP) delivered a total return of +106. 2%, compared to +29. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +640. 3% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBP or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 12% more volatile than FBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 19% for First BanCorp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBP or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First BanCorp. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBP or NBTB?
First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 4% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBP leads at 33. 2% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBP leads at 72. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBP or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 0x for First BanCorp. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBP: 5. 0% to $25. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBP or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 3. 0% for First BanCorp. (FBP).
09Is FBP or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +640. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +640. 3%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBP and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.