Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $153M | $1.99B | $1.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $3.14B | $1.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-1.75B | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 73.8% | 92.3% |
| Operating Margin | -164.9% | -41.4% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | — | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $5.16B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $825K | $83M | $100M |
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Falcon's Beyond Glo… (FBYD) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 55.5 | -44.5% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.09x
- Better valuation composite
- 11.2% margin vs FUN's -55.7%
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0%
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 95.2% 10Y total return vs FBYD's -17.2%
- Beta 1.54, current ratio 0.70x
- 6.4% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 25.5% vs 5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs FBYD's -63.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs FUN's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs FUN's -44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 25.5% vs 5.1% |
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 324.4x FBYD's $10M. FBYD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, FBYD holds the edge at +95.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $3.1B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$828M | $540M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$1.7B | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$169M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.1% | +73.8% | +92.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -164.9% | -41.4% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | -55.7% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -5.4% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | -2.3% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.3% | -11.7% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FUN and PRKS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, FBYD trades at a 27% valuation discount to PRKS's 11.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUN's 11.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $153M | $2.0B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193M | $7.1B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.51x | -8.56x | 11.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.25x | 3.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.64x | 0.74x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.87x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.91x | 7.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBYD delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRKS scores 5/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | -2.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -22.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.5% | +5.1% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.8% | +6.2% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $5.1B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $825,000 | $83M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $5.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.36x | -3.53x | 2.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBYD five years ago would be worth $8,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, FBYD leads with a +71.2% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBYD at -6.1% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.8% | +27.1% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.2% | -44.4% | -19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -48.7% | -36.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -54.4% | -32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | -37.5% | +95.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | -19.9% | -14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBYD and PRKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRKS currently trades 62.8% from its 52-week high vs FBYD's 41.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.83x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.02 | $38.47 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $12.51 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.4% | +51.2% | +62.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 48.3 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 1.6M | 974K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUN as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.1% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 16.2% for FUN (target: $23). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.88 | $47.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
PRKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBYD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FBYD vs FUN vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBYD or FUN or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
On trailing P/E, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) delivered a total return of -17. 2%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +95. 2% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 182% more volatile than FBYD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus -63. 0% for Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FBYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 125. 2% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the more profitable company, earning 327. 0% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 327. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus -235. 2% for FBYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBYD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBYD or FUN or PRKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 33.
1% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBYD or FUN or PRKS?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FBYD, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FBYD or FUN or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FBYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65)). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBYD: -17. 2%, PRKS: +95. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBYD and FUN and PRKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBYD (Industrials) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FBYD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FUN pays a dividend while FBYD, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare PRKS vs EPR
EPR is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PRKS.
Compare FBYD vs DIS
DIS overlaps with FBYD in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With DIS + CMCSA
DIS and CMCSA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.