Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $548M | $1.60B | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $730M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $111M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 41.9% | 56.1% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 21.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 10.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $592M | $371M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $2.35B | $185M |
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flushing Financial … (FFIC) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 139.5 | +39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FFIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
DCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 11.5x)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 103.4% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 65.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs FFIC's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs NBTB's +7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCOM leads 2 • FFIC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 1.9x FFIC's $453M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 4.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $730M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $161M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $111M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | $182M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +56.1% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +21.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +15.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +25.0% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.5% | +2.3% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 55% valuation discount to FFIC's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.91x vs DCOM's 2.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $548M | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | -$386M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.93x | 15.30x | 13.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.46x | 10.42x | 10.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.40x | 1.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.44x | -2.46x | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 2.19x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.06x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.81x | 8.75x | 10.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FFIC's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIC scores 8/9 vs NBTB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +7.7% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +6.1% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.25x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $466M | -$2.0B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $2.4B | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592M | $371M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 0.57x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $13,139 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,642 for FFIC. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +40.7% total return vs NBTB's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 29.2% vs NBTB's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +23.0% | +8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +40.7% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.4% | +115.5% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.6% | +22.1% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | +65.2% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.4% | +29.2% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DCOM and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.05x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.79 | $37.77 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $24.57 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +96.0% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 50.8 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 265K | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FFIC as "Hold", DCOM as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for DCOM (target: $40) vs 2.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.43% vs DCOM's 2.75%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $39.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +2.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $1.00 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FFIC vs DCOM vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFIC or DCOM or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 63x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +31. 4%, compared to -13. 6% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +103. 4% versus FFIC's +25. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 08β — meaning FFIC is approximately 21% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 84% for Flushing Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FFIC or DCOM or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 63x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Flushing Financial Corporation — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCOM: 9. 0% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FFIC or DCOM or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 8% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM).
09Is FFIC or DCOM or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +103. 4%, FFIC: +25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FFIC and DCOM and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FFIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.