Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FFIC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FFIC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $548M | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 41.9% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $592M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $185M |
FFIC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flushing Financial … (FFIC) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 139.5 | +39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FFIC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FFIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 151.4%
- Beta 1.08, yield 5.4%, current ratio 3.45x
- 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 103.4% 10Y total return vs FFIC's 25.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs FFIC's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.8% vs NBTB's +7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
FFIC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FFIC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 1.9x FFIC's $453M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 4.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $56M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +107.5% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FFIC and NBTB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 55% valuation discount to FFIC's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBTB's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FFIC's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $548M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.93x | 13.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.46x | 10.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.44x | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.81x | 10.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FFIC's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIC scores 8/9 vs NBTB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $466M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $592M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FFIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $13,139 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,642 for FFIC. Over the past 12 months, FFIC leads with a +35.8% total return vs NBTB's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FFIC at 22.4% vs NBTB's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.4% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.6% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.4% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.79 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FFIC as "Hold" and NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.7% upside for FFIC (target: $17) vs 2.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.43% vs NBTB's 3.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FFIC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FFIC vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFIC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) is the stronger pick with 11.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FFIC or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FFIC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +31. 4%, compared to -13. 6% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +103. 4% versus FFIC's +25. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FFIC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 08β — meaning FFIC is approximately 21% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 84% for Flushing Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FFIC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) is pulling ahead at 11.
1% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flushing Financial Corporation grew EPS 151. 4% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FFIC or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FFIC or NBTB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Flushing Financial Corporation — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIC: 3. 7% to $16. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FFIC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is FFIC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +103. 4%, FFIC: +25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FFIC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FFIC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.