Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $4.51B | $10.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $739M | $1.05B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $243M | $412M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 78.3% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 36.8% | 49.4% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 10.8x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $197M | $705M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $763M | $536M | $1.43B |
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 235.7 | +135.7% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- 227.0% 10Y total return vs BOKF's 172.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +47.4% vs FFIN's -2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs IBOC's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.0x), PEG 0.53 vs 3.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.4% vs FFIN's -2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BOKF's 0.4% |
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 4.5x FFIN's $739M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $739M | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $310M | $544M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $243M | $412M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $290M | $493M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +78.3% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +49.4% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +39.1% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +47.0% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | -7.6% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IBOC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 48% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BOKF's 5.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $4.5B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $4.7B | $13.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.90x | 10.96x | 16.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.02x | 10.77x | 13.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.01x | 0.54x | 5.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.27x | 8.61x | 17.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.27x | 4.28x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 1.39x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.84x | 9.12x | 7.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBOC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +13.4% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +2.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +10.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +5.4% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.22x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$566M | $168M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $763M | $536M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $197M | $705M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.48x | 2.43x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IBOC and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +47.4% total return vs FFIN's -2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBOC at 23.2% vs FFIN's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +9.6% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.5% | +19.0% | +47.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.9% | +86.9% | +82.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +61.1% | +62.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.6% | +227.0% | +172.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.1% | +23.2% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBOC and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.83x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.74 | $75.44 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.11 | $61.15 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.2% | +96.2% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 55.7 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 735K | 374K | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and IBOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FFIN as "Hold", IBOC as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -2.9% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.20% vs BOKF's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.25 | $85.00 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.9% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 16 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $1.40 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% |
IBOC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FFIN vs IBOC vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFIN or IBOC or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
0x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, International Bancshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +62.
2%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +227. 0% versus FFIN's +146. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 25% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FFIN or IBOC or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — FFIN or IBOC or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is FFIN or IBOC or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +227. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +227. 0%, BOKF: +172. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FFIN and IBOC and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.