Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIG vs CXM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FIG vs CXM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $6.93B | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $857M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.31B | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 82.4% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | -122.2% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 86.3x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $47M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $403M | $163M |
Quick Verdict: FIG vs CXM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 41.0%, EPS growth -19.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 2.58x
- 41.0% revenue growth vs CXM's 7.6%
CXM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
- -69.0% 10Y total return vs FIG's -82.2%
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.0% revenue growth vs CXM's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 86.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.7% margin vs FIG's -124.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs FIG's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -29.6% vs FIG's -82.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs FIG's -56.0%, ROIC 6.1% vs -95.3% |
FIG vs CXM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIG vs CXM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FIG and CXM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIG and CXM operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $857M in trailing revenue. CXM is the more profitable business, keeping 2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIG's -124.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $857M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $48M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $243M | $155M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.4% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -122.2% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -124.5% | +2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -90.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CXM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.54x | 60.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 86.28x | 12.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.56x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.59x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.14x | 8.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CXM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CXM delivers a 3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-87 for FIG. FIG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CXM's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXM scores 6/9 vs FIG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.0% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.0% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -95.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$345M | -$116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $163M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $47M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CXM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CXM five years ago would be worth $3,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,780 for FIG. Over the past 12 months, CXM leads with a -29.6% total return vs FIG's -82.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXM at -21.7% vs FIG's -43.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | -25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.2% | -29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -69.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.7% | -21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CXM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CXM is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIG's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CXM currently trades 58.0% from its 52-week high vs FIG's 14.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $142.92 | $9.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.60 | $4.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.4% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.4M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIG as "Hold" and CXM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 75.9% upside for FIG (target: $36) vs 30.8% for CXM (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.17 | $7.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.4% |
CXM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
FIG vs CXM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIG or CXM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Figma, Inc.
(FIG) is the stronger pick with 41. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM). Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) offers the better valuation at 60. 6x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Figma, Inc. (FIG) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIG or CXM?
On forward P/E, Sprinklr, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIG or CXM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprinklr, Inc.
(CXM) delivered a total return of -69. 0%, compared to -82. 2% for Figma, Inc. (FIG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXM returned -69. 0% versus FIG's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIG or CXM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sprinklr, Inc.
(CXM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Figma, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning FIG is approximately 100% more volatile than CXM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Figma, Inc. (FIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 8% for Sprinklr, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIG or CXM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Figma, Inc.
(FIG) is pulling ahead at 41. 0% versus 7. 6% for Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Figma, Inc. grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -79. 5% for Sprinklr, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIG or CXM?
Sprinklr, Inc.
(CXM) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -118. 4% for Figma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CXM leads at 4. 7% versus -122. 2% for FIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIG leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIG or CXM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sprinklr, Inc.
(CXM) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 86. 3x for Figma, Inc. — 74. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIG: 75. 9% to $36. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIG or CXM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FIG or CXM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sprinklr, Inc.
(CXM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Figma, Inc. (FIG) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CXM: -69. 0%, FIG: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIG and CXM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CXM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.