Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLO vs NWFL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.82B
5Y Perf.-63.5%
NWFL
Norwood Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$278M
5Y Perf.+23.2%

FLO vs NWFL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLO logoFLO
NWFL logoNWFL
IndustryPackaged FoodsBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.82B$278M
Revenue (TTM)$5.26B$136M
Net Income (TTM)$84M$28M
Gross Margin48.1%63.6%
Operating Margin6.0%26.1%
Forward P/E10.4x8.7x
Total Debt$2.33B$74M
Cash & Equiv.$12M$44M

FLO vs NWFLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLO
NWFL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO)10036.5-63.5%
Norwood Financial C… (NWFL)100123.2+23.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLO vs NWFL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NWFL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Flowers Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
The Income Pick

FLO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 11.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.75x
  • Beta 0.32, yield 11.4%, current ratio 0.75x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NWFL
Norwood Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

NWFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
  • 116.3% 10Y total return vs FLO's -13.0%
  • 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs FLO's 3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNWFL logoNWFL34.2% NII/revenue growth vs FLO's 3.0%
ValueNWFL logoNWFLLower P/E (8.7x vs 10.4x)
Quality / MarginsNWFL logoNWFL20.4% margin vs FLO's 1.6%
Stability / SafetyFLO logoFLOBeta 0.32 vs NWFL's 0.72
DividendsFLO logoFLO11.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs NWFL's 4.2%
Momentum (1Y)NWFL logoNWFL+23.2% vs FLO's -44.8%
Efficiency (ROA)FLO logoFLO2.0% ROA vs NWFL's 1.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs 7.3%

FLO vs NWFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLOFlowers Foods, Inc.
FY 2024
Branded Retail
63.9%$3.3B
Other
36.1%$1.8B
NWFLNorwood Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Debit Card
29.6%$2M
Overdraft Fees
19.6%$2M
Fiduciary Activities
12.9%$1M
Loan Related Service Fees
9.6%$768,000
Financial Service Other
9.4%$749,000
Commissions On Mutual Funds And Annuities
8.9%$708,000
Deposit Account
5.9%$470,000
Other (2)
4.1%$331,000

FLO vs NWFL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNWFLLAGGINGFLO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NWFL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

FLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 38.6x NWFL's $136M. NWFL is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLO's 1.6%.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.3B$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$482M$37M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$28M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$329M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.1%+63.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.0%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.3%+21.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.6%+152.6%
NWFL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FLO and NWFL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.0x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 54% valuation discount to FLO's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLO's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWFL's 8.4x.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$278M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$308M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.55x9.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.37x8.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.08x8.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.35x2.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x1.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.70x9.63x
Evenly matched — FLO and NWFL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NWFL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NWFL delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLO. NWFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLO's 1.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWFL scores 7/9 vs FLO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.1%+7.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.4%+11.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.79x0.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.3B$30M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$44M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$74M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.52x0.74x
NWFL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NWFL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NWFL five years ago would be worth $14,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,355 for FLO. Over the past 12 months, NWFL leads with a +23.2% total return vs FLO's -44.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWFL at 9.4% vs FLO's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.8%+10.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-44.8%+23.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.7%+31.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.5%+44.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.0%+116.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-26.2%+9.4%
NWFL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLO and NWFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLO is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWFL's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWFL currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs FLO's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.68$32.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.86$23.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.8%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.148.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.0M22K
Evenly matched — FLO and NWFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FLO as "Hold" and NWFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for FLO (target: $10) vs 9.4% for NWFL (target: $33). For income investors, FLO offers the higher dividend yield at 11.45% vs NWFL's 4.16%.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…NWFL logoNWFLNorwood Financial…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$33.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts201
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.4%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises199
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.99$1.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.1%
FLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NWFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallNorwood Financial Corp. (NWFL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLO vs NWFL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLO or NWFL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLO or NWFL?

On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Flowers Foods, Inc. at 21. 6x. On forward P/E, Norwood Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLO or NWFL?

Over the past 5 years, Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) delivered a total return of +44. 2%, compared to -46. 5% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWFL returned +116. 3% versus FLO's -13. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLO or NWFL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flowers Foods, Inc.

(FLO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Norwood Financial Corp. 's 0. 72β — meaning NWFL is approximately 124% more volatile than FLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 179% for Flowers Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLO or NWFL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus 3. 0% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to -65. 8% for Flowers Foods, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLO or NWFL?

Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Flowers Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus 6. 6% for FLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWFL leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLO or NWFL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Norwood Financial Corp.

(NWFL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Flowers Foods, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLO: 16. 0% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLO or NWFL?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 4. 2% for Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL).

09

Is FLO or NWFL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Flowers Foods, Inc.

(FLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 11. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLO: -13. 0%, NWFL: +116. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLO and NWFL?

These companies operate in different sectors (FLO (Consumer Defensive) and NWFL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FLO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWFL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLO and NWFL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLO: 11.0% · NWFL: 34.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLO: 21.6x · NWFL: 10.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.