Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FMC vs MOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
FMC vs MOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $1.86B | $7.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.43B | $11.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.50B | $1.22B |
| Gross Margin | 35.3% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | -59.5% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.20B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $585M | $277M |
FMC vs MOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FMC Corporation (FMC) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMC vs MOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.63, yield 15.6%
- Beta 1.63, yield 15.6%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 16.1x)
MOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.2%
- 11.1% 10Y total return vs FMC's -25.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs FMC's -18.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs FMC's -72.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs FMC's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.6% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs MOS's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.1% vs FMC's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs FMC's -23.0%, ROIC 6.1% vs -21.2% |
FMC vs MOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMC vs MOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FMC and MOS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 3.4x FMC's $3.4B. MOS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMC's -72.9%. On growth, FMC holds the edge at -4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.9B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.5B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$91M | -$535M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.3% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.5% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -72.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -7.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FMC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.83x | 5.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.37x | 16.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-82 for FMC. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMC's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOS scores 7/9 vs FMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -82.3% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.0% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.2% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.9% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.00x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $585M | $277M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.24x | 8.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOS five years ago would be worth $7,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,058 for FMC. Over the past 12 months, MOS leads with a -21.1% total return vs FMC's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOS at -12.9% vs FMC's -43.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.3% | -6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.9% | -21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | -34.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.4% | -22.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | +11.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.2% | -12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMC's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOS currently trades 60.8% from its 52-week high vs FMC's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.78 | $38.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.17 | $22.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.2% | +60.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 9.7M |
Analyst Outlook
FMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMC as "Hold" and MOS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.4% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs 4.8% for FMC (target: $16). For income investors, FMC offers the higher dividend yield at 15.65% vs MOS's 4.09%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.58 | $31.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.33 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
MOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FMC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FMC vs MOS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMC or MOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FMC Corporation (FMC) a "Hold" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMC or MOS?
On forward P/E, FMC Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMC or MOS?
Over the past 5 years, The Mosaic Company (MOS) delivered a total return of -22.
6%, compared to -79. 4% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOS returned +12. 7% versus FMC's -26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMC or MOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus FMC Corporation's 1. 63β — meaning FMC is approximately 213% more volatile than MOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for FMC Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMC or MOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -757. 4% for FMC Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MOS leads at -15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMC or MOS?
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -64. 6% for FMC Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOS leads at 9. 9% versus -54. 4% for FMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMC leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMC or MOS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FMC Corporation (FMC) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for The Mosaic Company — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 34. 4% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMC or MOS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FMC Corporation (FMC) offers the highest yield at 15. 6%, versus 4. 1% for The Mosaic Company (MOS).
09Is FMC or MOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 4. 1% yield). FMC Corporation (FMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOS: +12. 7%, FMC: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMC and MOS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.