FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$4.47B
5Y Perf.+16.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FOLD vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$2.55B
5Y Perf.-69.4%
FOLD vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FOLD | RARE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.47B | $2.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $599M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | 40.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $444M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $214M | $434M |
FOLD vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FOLD
RARE
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 116.2 | +16.2% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOLD vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FOLD leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth 64.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.0%
- 125.0% 10Y total return vs RARE's -58.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle
In this particular matchup, RARE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FOLD | 32.3% revenue growth vs RARE's 20.1% |
| Quality / Margins | FOLD | -2.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FOLD | Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FOLD | +134.1% vs RARE's -26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FOLD | -1.6% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 4.8% vs -89.4% |
FOLD vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FOLD vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFOLDLAGGINGRARE
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceut…
0leads
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RAREMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FOLD6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FOLD8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FOLD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FOLD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and FOLD operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $599M in trailing revenue. FOLD is the more profitable business, keeping -2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $599M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.5% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.5% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -17.2% |
FOLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FOLD and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -80.50x | -4.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.62x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 140.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.46x | 3.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.73x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — FOLD and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOLD scores 5/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $230M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $214M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $444M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | -14.49x |
FOLD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $15,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,241 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +134.1% total return vs RARE's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs RARE's -18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +134.1% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | -44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | -77.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.0% | -58.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | -18.0% |
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.50 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +61.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.2 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 1.8M |
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FOLD as "Buy" and RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.6% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… | RAREUltragenyx Pharma… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FOLD leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallAmicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FOLD vs RARE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOLD or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger pick with 32. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Analysts rate Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FOLD or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) delivered a total return of +50. 9%, compared to -77. 6% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +125. 0% versus RARE's -58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FOLD or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 125% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FOLD or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is pulling ahead at 32. 3% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 64. 7% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RARE leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FOLD or RARE?
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 6% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 4. 7% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FOLD or RARE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 98.
6% to $51. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — FOLD or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FOLD or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +125. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +125. 0%, RARE: -58. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FOLD and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FOLD: 19.5% · RARE: -2.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.