Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FOUR vs PAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.93B
5Y Perf.-34.0%
PAX
Patria Investments Limited

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$2.06B
5Y Perf.-27.6%

FOUR vs PAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FOUR logoFOUR
PAX logoPAX
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureAsset Management
Market Cap$3.93B$2.06B
Revenue (TTM)$3.88B$384M
Net Income (TTM)$195M$86M
Gross Margin32.6%96.2%
Operating Margin8.0%34.2%
Forward P/E7.7x9.0x
Total Debt$2.88B$175M
Cash & Equiv.$1.21B$55M

FOUR vs PAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FOUR
PAX
StockJan 21May 26Return
Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR)10066.0-34.0%
Patria Investments … (PAX)10072.4-27.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FOUR vs PAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PAX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Shift4 Payments, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.51
  • Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 111.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.5%
  • 27.9% 10Y total return vs PAX's -14.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
The Banking Pick

PAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 27.4%, current ratio 1.03x
  • Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.03x
  • 22.3% margin vs FOUR's 5.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOUR logoFOUR29.9% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6%
ValueFOUR logoFOURLower P/E (7.7x vs 9.0x)
Quality / MarginsPAX logoPAX22.3% margin vs FOUR's 5.0%
Stability / SafetyPAX logoPAXBeta 1.09 vs FOUR's 1.51, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PAX logoPAX+24.7% vs FOUR's -48.3%
Efficiency (ROA)PAX logoPAX6.3% ROA vs FOUR's 2.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 7.6%

FOUR vs PAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.
FY 2024
Payments Based Revenue
89.8%$3.0B
Subscription And Other Revenues
10.2%$341M
PAXPatria Investments Limited
FY 2023
Advisory and Other Ancillary Fees
100.0%$3M

FOUR vs PAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPAXLAGGINGFOUR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PAX leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

FOUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 10.1x PAX's $384M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOUR's 5.0%.

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.9B$384M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$691M$174M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$195M$86M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$499M$236M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.6%+96.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.0%+34.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%+22.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-76.7%-40.5%
PAX leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, FOUR trades at a 41% valuation discount to PAX's 23.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOUR's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAX's 16.6x.

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
Market CapShares × price$3.9B$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.6B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.16x23.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.70x9.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.29x16.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.18x5.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.86x3.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.64x
FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PAX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

PAX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for FOUR. PAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 5/9 vs PAX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.7%+14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.2%+6.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.6%+12.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.8%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.83x0.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.7B$120M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.2B$55M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.9B$175M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.82x7.45x
PAX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PAX five years ago would be worth $11,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,098 for FOUR. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +24.7% total return vs FOUR's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAX at 1.5% vs FOUR's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.6%-17.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.3%+24.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.4%+4.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.0%+14.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.9%-14.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.4%+1.5%
PAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOUR's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAX currently trades 72.6% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 39.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$108.50$17.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.91$10.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+39.5%+72.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.754.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M856K
PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FOUR as "Buy" and PAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.0% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs 39.3% for PAX (target: $18).

MetricFOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.36$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts295
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.7%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PAX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallPatria Investments Limited (PAX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FOUR vs PAX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FOUR or PAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FOUR or PAX?

On trailing P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Patria Investments Limited at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FOUR or PAX?

Over the past 5 years, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) delivered a total return of +14.

0%, compared to -49. 0% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +27. 9% versus PAX's -14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FOUR or PAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

09β versus Shift4 Payments, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FOUR is approximately 38% more volatile than PAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 3% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FOUR or PAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shift4 Payments, Inc. grew EPS 111. 9% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Patria Investments Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FOUR or PAX?

Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

3% net margin versus 6. 9% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus 7. 4% for FOUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FOUR or PAX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Patria Investments Limited — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 71. 0% to $73. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FOUR or PAX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FOUR or PAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09)). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -14. 9%, FOUR: +27. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FOUR and PAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (FOUR (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FOUR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FOUR and PAX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FOUR: 29.4% · PAX: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(FOUR: 5.0% · PAX: 22.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FOUR: 14.2x · PAX: 23.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.