Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FOUR vs PAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
FOUR vs PAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $3.93B | $2.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.88B | $384M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $195M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 96.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.88B | $175M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.21B | $55M |
FOUR vs PAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOUR vs PAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.51
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 111.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.5%
- 27.9% 10Y total return vs PAX's -14.9%
PAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 27.4%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 1.03x
- 22.3% margin vs FOUR's 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 9.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs FOUR's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs FOUR's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.7% vs FOUR's -48.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs FOUR's 2.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 7.6% |
FOUR vs PAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOUR vs PAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAX leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 10.1x PAX's $384M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOUR's 5.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $384M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $691M | $174M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $499M | $236M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +96.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.7% | -40.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, FOUR trades at a 41% valuation discount to PAX's 23.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOUR's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PAX's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.16x | 23.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.70x | 9.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.29x | 16.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 5.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.86x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for FOUR. PAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 5/9 vs PAX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.83x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $55M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $175M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.82x | 7.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAX five years ago would be worth $11,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,098 for FOUR. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +24.7% total return vs FOUR's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAX at 1.5% vs FOUR's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.6% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.3% | +24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | +4.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | +14.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.9% | -14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.4% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOUR's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAX currently trades 72.6% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 39.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $108.50 | $17.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.91 | $10.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.5% | +72.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 856K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FOUR as "Buy" and PAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.0% upside for FOUR (target: $73) vs 39.3% for PAX (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.36 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% |
PAX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FOUR vs PAX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOUR or PAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOUR or PAX?
On trailing P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Patria Investments Limited at 23. 9x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOUR or PAX?
Over the past 5 years, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) delivered a total return of +14.
0%, compared to -49. 0% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOUR returned +27. 9% versus PAX's -14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOUR or PAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus Shift4 Payments, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FOUR is approximately 38% more volatile than PAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 3% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOUR or PAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shift4 Payments, Inc. grew EPS 111. 9% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Patria Investments Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOUR or PAX?
Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus 6. 9% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus 7. 4% for FOUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOUR or PAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc.
(FOUR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Patria Investments Limited — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOUR: 71. 0% to $73. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOUR or PAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FOUR or PAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09)). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -14. 9%, FOUR: +27. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOUR and PAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (FOUR (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.