FSK vs ARCC

For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.

3x versus FS KKR Capital Corp. at 290. 6x. On forward P/E, FS KKR Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +49.

5%, compared to +19. 2% for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 7% versus FSK's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

77β versus FS KKR Capital Corp. 's 0. 87β — meaning FSK is approximately 13% more volatile than ARCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 131% for FS KKR Capital Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.

9% versus 5. 5% for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ares Capital Corporation grew EPS -23. 8% year-over-year, compared to -98. 1% for FS KKR Capital Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.

3% net margin versus 0. 9% for FS KKR Capital Corp. — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARCC leads at 69. 7% versus 49. 5% for FSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, FS KKR Capital Corp.

(FSK) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Ares Capital Corporation — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSK: 44. 5% to $16. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) offers the highest yield at 24. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

77), 2. 0% yield, +139. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARCC: +139. 7%, FSK: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.