FTRK
Fast Track Group
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-91.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FTRK vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$182M
5Y Perf.+0.2%
FTRK vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FTRK | TBI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $182M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-321K | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -35.7% | -2.6% |
| Total Debt | $27K | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $268K | $25M |
FTRK vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FTRK
TBI
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast Track Group (FTRK) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTRK vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TBI leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FTRK
Fast Track Group
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, FTRK is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: communication services exposure
TBI
TrueBlue, Inc.
The Income Pick
TBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.13
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- -68.4% 10Y total return vs FTRK's -87.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TBI | 3.1% revenue growth vs FTRK's -21.5% |
| Quality / Margins | TBI | -4.3% margin vs FTRK's -31.9% |
| Stability / Safety | TBI | Beta 1.13 vs FTRK's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TBI | +51.0% vs FTRK's -87.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TBI | -8.1% ROA vs FTRK's -23.6% |
FTRK vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FTRK vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTBILAGGINGFTRK
FTRKFast Track Group
1leads
TBITrueBlue, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FTRKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TBI3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FTRK4/5
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TBI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TBI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 1239.1x FTRK's $1M. TBI is the more profitable business, keeping -4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTRK's -31.9%. On growth, FTRK holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33,208 | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$321,093 | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $426,254 | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.7% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.9% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -37.5% |
TBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FTRK and TBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $182M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.52x | -3.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 160.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.73x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.76x | — |
Evenly matched — FTRK and TBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTRK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTRK scores 5/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.6% | -8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$241,742 | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $268,436 | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26,694 | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.65x | -46.19x |
FTRK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TBI five years ago would be worth $2,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,216 for FTRK. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs FTRK's -87.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TBI at -26.4% vs FTRK's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.8% | +51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -68.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | -26.4% |
TBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TBI is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTRK's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBI currently trades 77.2% from its 52-week high vs FTRK's 4.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.69 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.1% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 83.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 386K |
TBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FTRKFast Track Group | TBITrueBlue, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TBI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FTRK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallTrueBlue, Inc. (TBI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FTRK vs TBI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTRK or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FTRK or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) delivered a total return of -78. 7%, compared to -87. 8% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TBI returned -68. 4% versus FTRK's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FTRK or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Fast Track Group's 1. 49β — meaning FTRK is approximately 31% more volatile than TBI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FTRK or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FTRK or TBI?
TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 0% net margin versus -44. 6% for Fast Track Group — meaning it keeps -3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TBI leads at -1. 7% versus -42. 1% for FTRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBI leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FTRK or TBI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FTRK or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TBI: -68. 4%, FTRK: -87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FTRK and TBI?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTRK (Communication Services) and TBI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FTRK: 717.2% · TBI: -100.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.