Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $182M | $1.41B | $790M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $1.25B | $17.96B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-321K | $-53M | $-13M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | 28.4% | 16.7% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -35.7% | -2.6% | 0.8% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.3x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $27K | $171M | $2.39B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $268K | $25M | $871M | $2M |
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fast Track Group (FTRK) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 105.9 | +5.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTRK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs FTRK's -21.5%
- +51.0% vs FTRK's -87.8%
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs MAN's -30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs FTRK's -21.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs FTRK's -31.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs FTRK's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.0% vs FTRK's -87.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs FTRK's -23.6% |
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • FTRK leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FTRK and KFRC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 17861.3x FTRK's $1M. KFRC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTRK's -31.9%. On growth, FTRK holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $1.2B | $18.0B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33,208 | -$10M | $236M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$321,093 | -$53M | -$13M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $426,254 | -$60M | -$161M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.7% | -2.6% | +0.8% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.9% | -4.3% | -0.1% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | -4.8% | -0.9% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | -100.0% | +7.1% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -37.5% | +36.2% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $182M | $1.4B | $790M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $329M | $2.9B | $858M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.52x | -3.73x | -104.90x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.28x | 17.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 160.03x | 9.02x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.73x | 0.11x | 0.08x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.65x | 0.69x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.76x | — | — | 16.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TBI. KFRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTRK scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -18.7% | -0.6% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.6% | -8.1% | -0.1% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | +5.6% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.3% | +6.2% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.62x | 1.16x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$241,742 | $146M | $1.5B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $268,436 | $25M | $871M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26,694 | $171M | $2.4B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.65x | -46.19x | 1.98x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,216 for FTRK. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs FTRK's -87.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -4.8% vs FTRK's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +36.6% | +1.2% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.8% | +51.0% | -17.0% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -60.2% | -46.4% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -78.7% | -64.9% | -16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -68.4% | -30.8% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.5% | -26.4% | -18.8% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTRK's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs FTRK's 4.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.13x | 1.03x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.69 | $7.78 | $47.34 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $3.18 | $25.15 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.1% | +77.2% | +64.3% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 83.2 | 47.1 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 386K | 1.1M | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAN and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBI as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -4.3% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs KFRC's 3.58%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.75 | $37.86 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 29 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.43 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +2.7% | +6.4% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FTRK vs TBI vs MAN vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -87. 8% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus FTRK's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Fast Track Group's 1. 49β — meaning FTRK is approximately 181% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kforce Inc. (KFRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -21. 5% for Fast Track Group (FTRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -44. 6% for Fast Track Group — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFRC leads at 3. 8% versus -42. 1% for FTRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FTRK, TBI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTRK or TBI or MAN or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, FTRK: -87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTRK and TBI and MAN and KFRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTRK (Communication Services) and TBI (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MAN, KFRC pay a dividend while FTRK, TBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.