Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUNC vs NKSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FUNC vs NKSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $244M | $234M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 22.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $8M |
FUNC vs NKSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 119.2 | +19.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUNC vs NKSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs NKSH's 50.4%
NKSH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.76, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1203.84x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +47.8% vs FUNC's +27.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs NKSH's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.4x), PEG 0.76 vs 141.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs NKSH's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NKSH's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.8% vs FUNC's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
FUNC vs NKSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FUNC vs NKSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC and NKSH operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $85M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.6% (NKSH) to 18.4% (FUNC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +91.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 19% valuation discount to NKSH's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.06x vs NKSH's 141.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $234M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.91x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | 11.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 141.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 15.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NKSH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for NKSH. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,828 for NKSH. Over the past 12 months, NKSH leads with a +47.8% total return vs FUNC's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs NKSH's 14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.3% | +51.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.8% | +28.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.2% | +50.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.3% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FUNC and NKSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKSH's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.95 | $40.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.00 | $24.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUNC and NKSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUNC as "Buy" and NKSH as "Buy". For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.11% vs FUNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKSH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FUNC vs NKSH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUNC or NKSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUNC or NKSH?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus National Bankshares, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 141. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or NKSH?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.
8%, compared to +28. 3% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus NKSH's +50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUNC or NKSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NKSH is approximately 6% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUNC or NKSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus 7. 9% for National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for First United Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUNC or NKSH?
National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 18. 4% for First United Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 22. 5% for NKSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUNC or NKSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 141. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for National Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or NKSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).
09Is FUNC or NKSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, NKSH: +50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUNC and NKSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.