GAUZ vs NNDM

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 32. 8% for Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (GAUZ). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) delivered a total return of -72. 3%, compared to -97. 3% for Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (GAUZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAUZ returned -97. 3% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gauzy Ltd.

Ordinary Shares (GAUZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Nano Dimension Ltd. 's 1. 74β — meaning NNDM is approximately 55% more volatile than GAUZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 100% for Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus 32. 8% for Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (GAUZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares grew EPS 31. 7% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAUZ leads at 141. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Gauzy Ltd.

Ordinary Shares (GAUZ) is the more profitable company, earning -51. 4% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps -51. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAUZ leads at -29. 7% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NNDM leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gauzy Ltd.

Ordinary Shares (GAUZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAUZ: -97. 3%, NNDM: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.