Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GETY vs CSGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
GETY vs CSGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $333M | $14.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $981M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-206M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 570.0x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $720M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $1.73B |
GETY vs CSGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getty Images Holdin… (GETY) | 100 | 7.9 | -92.1% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GETY vs CSGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GETY is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
CSGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth -95.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 74.0% 10Y total return vs GETY's -92.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs GETY's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.2x vs 570.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.7% margin vs GETY's -21.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs GETY's 1.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -54.3% vs GETY's -57.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs GETY's -7.5%, ROIC -0.9% vs 4.0% |
GETY vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GETY vs CSGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 3.5x GETY's $981M. CSGP is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GETY's -21.0%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $981M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $146M | $278M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$206M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.0% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +127.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GETY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GETY's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 81.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $333M | $14.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $963M | $13.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | 2052.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 570.00x | 25.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.58x | 81.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.11x | 352.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSGP delivers a 0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GETY. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GETY's 1.20x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.9% | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $630M | -$589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $720M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGP five years ago would be worth $4,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $797 for GETY. Over the past 12 months, CSGP leads with a -54.3% total return vs GETY's -57.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSGP at -22.9% vs GETY's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.1% | -48.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.8% | -54.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | -58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +74.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.8% | -22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CSGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GETY's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGP currently trades 35.0% from its 52-week high vs GETY's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.21 | $97.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $33.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +35.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 33.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GETY as "Hold" and CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 723.3% upside for GETY (target: $7) vs 81.7% for CSGP (target: $62).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.57 | $61.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
CSGP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GETY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GETY vs CSGP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GETY or CSGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY). CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) offers the better valuation at 2052. 4x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GETY or CSGP?
On forward P/E, CoStar Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GETY or CSGP?
Over the past 5 years, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) delivered a total return of -58. 5%, compared to -92. 0% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGP returned +74. 0% versus GETY's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GETY or CSGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Getty Images Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning GETY is approximately 150% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 120% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GETY or CSGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 4. 5% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CoStar Group, Inc. grew EPS -95. 1% year-over-year, compared to -624. 7% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GETY or CSGP?
CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -21. 0% for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GETY leads at 8. 6% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GETY or CSGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) trades at 25. 2x forward P/E versus 570. 0x for Getty Images Holdings, Inc. — 544. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GETY: 723. 3% to $6. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — GETY or CSGP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GETY or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (GETY) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSGP: +74. 0%, GETY: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GETY and CSGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (GETY (Communication Services) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GETY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 7%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.