Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GO vs KR vs SFM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
GO vs KR vs SFM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $781M | $41.77B | $7.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.69B | $147.64B | $8.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-225M | $1.02B | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 22.3% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.7% | 1.3% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 12.6x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.81B | $24.68B | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $3.33B | $257M |
GO vs KR vs SFM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grocery Outlet Hold… (GO) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 311.4 | +211.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GO vs KR vs SFM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 14.0x)
- 2.0% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- -7.7% vs SFM's -53.8%
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.17
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 198.6% 10Y total return vs KR's 115.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs GO's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs GO's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.7% vs SFM's -53.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs GO's -6.9%, ROIC 17.8% vs -6.0% |
GO vs KR vs SFM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GO vs KR vs SFM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 31.5x GO's $4.7B. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GO's -4.8%. On growth, GO holds the edge at +10.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $147.6B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$91M | $5.5B | $996M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$225M | $1.0B | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $3.5B | $361M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +22.3% | +37.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +1.3% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +0.7% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +2.4% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +1.2% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | +50.0% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, SFM trades at a 66% valuation discount to KR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SFM's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KR's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $781M | $41.8B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $63.1B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.46x | 42.86x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.96x | 12.60x | 14.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.86x | 9.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 7.28x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.83x | 12.47x | 15.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-20 for GO. SFM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.8% | +13.0% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +2.0% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | +5.0% | +17.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.0% | +5.5% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 4.16x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $21.3B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $3.3B | $257M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $24.7B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.45x | 2.59x | 254.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $29,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,894 for GO. Over the past 12 months, KR leads with a -7.7% total return vs SFM's -53.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFM at 29.7% vs GO's -35.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.7% | +5.4% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.3% | -7.7% | -53.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +41.9% | +118.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +89.9% | +196.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.1% | +115.3% | +198.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.9% | +12.4% | +29.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GO's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KR currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs GO's 41.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | -0.64x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.41 | $76.58 | $182.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.66 | $58.60 | $64.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.0% | +86.2% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 42.4 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 5.6M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
KR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GO as "Hold", KR as "Buy", SFM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.8% upside for GO (target: $12) vs 13.2% for KR (target: $75). KR is the only dividend payer here at 2.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.08 | $74.75 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 44 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.5% | +6.4% |
SFM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KR leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
GO vs KR vs SFM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GO or KR or SFM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GO or KR or SFM?
On trailing P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus The Kroger Co. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GO or KR or SFM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +196. 8%, compared to -81. 1% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFM returned +198. 6% versus GO's -72. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GO or KR or SFM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. 's 0. 62β — meaning GO is approximately -197% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GO or KR or SFM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -675. 0% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GO or KR or SFM?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -4. 8% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus -4. 7% for GO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GO or KR or SFM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co.
(KR) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GO: 51. 8% to $12. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — GO or KR or SFM?
In this comparison, KR (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. GO, SFM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GO or KR or SFM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +115. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +115. 3%, GO: -72. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GO and KR and SFM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock. KR pays a dividend while GO, SFM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.