GRCE
Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.-25.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GRCE vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$4.47B
5Y Perf.+26.6%
GRCE vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GRCE | FOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $37M | $4.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $599M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $444M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $214M |
GRCE vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GRCE
FOLD
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Therapeutics,… (GRCE) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 126.6 | +26.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRCE vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FOLD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Grace Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GRCE
Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Leader
GRCE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 55.3% revenue growth vs FOLD's 32.3%
- 1.0% margin vs FOLD's -2.3%
Best for: growth and quality
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth 64.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.0%
- 125.0% 10Y total return vs GRCE's -21.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GRCE | 55.3% revenue growth vs FOLD's 32.3% |
| Quality / Margins | GRCE | 1.0% margin vs FOLD's -2.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FOLD | Beta 0.63 vs GRCE's 0.87 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FOLD | +134.1% vs GRCE's -19.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FOLD | -1.6% ROA vs GRCE's -8.7%, ROIC 4.8% vs -30.1% |
GRCE vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFOLDLAGGINGGRCE
GRCEGrace Therapeutics, I…
0leads
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GRCEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FOLD1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FOLD5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FOLD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FOLD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD and GRCE operate at a comparable scale, with $599M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $599M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | +3.8% |
FOLD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GRCE and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.00x | -80.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 140.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 22.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — GRCE and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOLD delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-9 for GRCE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOLD scores 5/9 vs GRCE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $444M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.11x |
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $15,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,874 for GRCE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +134.1% total return vs GRCE's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs GRCE's -7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.2% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.7% | +134.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | +50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | +125.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | +6.0% |
FOLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRCE's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GRCE's 45.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.18 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.79 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.8% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 881K | 3.0M |
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | GRCEGrace Therapeutic… | FOLDAmicus Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FOLD leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallAmicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GRCE vs FOLD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRCE or FOLD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GRCE or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) delivered a total return of +50. 9%, compared to -21. 3% for Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (GRCE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +125. 0% versus GRCE's -21. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GRCE or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Grace Therapeutics, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning GRCE is approximately 37% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GRCE or FOLD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 64. 7% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for Grace Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GRCE or FOLD?
Grace Therapeutics, Inc.
(GRCE) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -10. 6% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 4. 7% versus 0. 0% for GRCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GRCE or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GRCE or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +125. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +125. 0%, GRCE: -21. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GRCE and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.