Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HLMN vs FERG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
HLMN vs FERG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.56B | $49.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.56B | $31.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $2.07B |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $828M | $5.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $674M |
HLMN vs FERG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillman Solutions C… (HLMN) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Ferguson plc (FERG) | 100 | 212.8 | +112.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLMN vs FERG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 122.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 67.4%, current ratio 2.51x
- 5.4% revenue growth vs FERG's 3.8%
FERG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.0%
- 382.9% 10Y total return vs HLMN's -19.1%
- Beta 1.24, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs FERG's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.6x vs 22.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs HLMN's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs HLMN's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.6% vs HLMN's +10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs HLMN's 1.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs 4.5% |
HLMN vs FERG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLMN vs FERG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLMN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 20.2x HLMN's $1.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (FERG) to 2.3% (HLMN). On growth, HLMN holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $31.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $251M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $91M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +30.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HLMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.1x trailing earnings, FERG trades at a 32% valuation discount to HLMN's 39.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HLMN's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FERG's 18.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $49.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $54.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.70x | 27.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.63x | 22.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.12x | 18.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 1.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 8.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.40x | 30.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FERG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FERG delivers a 35.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $3 for HLMN. HLMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FERG's 1.02x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +35.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 1.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $801M | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $674M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $828M | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.96x | 15.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FERG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FERG five years ago would be worth $20,448 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,014 for HLMN. Over the past 12 months, FERG leads with a +51.6% total return vs HLMN's +10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FERG at 23.0% vs HLMN's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.8% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.7% | +51.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.3% | +86.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.9% | +104.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | +382.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FERG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FERG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLMN's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FERG currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs HLMN's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.85 | $271.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.55 | $166.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.1 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HLMN as "Buy" and FERG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.3% upside for HLMN (target: $14) vs 7.5% for FERG (target: $271). FERG is the only dividend payer here at 0.97% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $271.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +1.9% |
FERG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HLMN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
HLMN vs FERG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLMN or FERG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hillman Solutions Corp.
(HLMN) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Ferguson plc (FERG). Ferguson plc (FERG) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLMN or FERG?
On trailing P/E, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the cheapest at 27.
1x versus Hillman Solutions Corp. at 39. 7x. On forward P/E, Hillman Solutions Corp. is actually cheaper at 13. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLMN or FERG?
Over the past 5 years, Ferguson plc (FERG) delivered a total return of +104.
5%, compared to -29. 9% for Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FERG returned +382. 9% versus HLMN's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLMN or FERG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ferguson plc (FERG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
24β versus Hillman Solutions Corp. 's 1. 37β — meaning HLMN is approximately 11% more volatile than FERG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 102% for Ferguson plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLMN or FERG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hillman Solutions Corp.
(HLMN) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 3. 8% for Ferguson plc (FERG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hillman Solutions Corp. grew EPS 122. 2% year-over-year, compared to 9. 3% for Ferguson plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FERG leads at 2. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLMN or FERG?
Ferguson plc (FERG) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus 2. 6% for Hillman Solutions Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FERG leads at 8. 5% versus 7. 6% for HLMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLMN leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLMN or FERG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hillman Solutions Corp.
(HLMN) trades at 13. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Ferguson plc — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLMN: 76. 3% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLMN or FERG?
In this comparison, FERG (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HLMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HLMN or FERG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
24), 1. 0% yield, +382. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FERG: +382. 9%, HLMN: -19. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLMN and FERG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FERG pays a dividend while HLMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.