Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMKTA vs CASY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
IMKTA vs CASY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $31.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.42B | $16.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $650M |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 47.4x |
| Total Debt | $544M | $2.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $327M |
IMKTA vs CASY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingles Markets, Inc… (IMKTA) | 100 | 207.5 | +107.5% |
| Casey's General Sto… (CASY) | 100 | 537.2 | +437.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMKTA vs CASY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMKTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 33.6%, current ratio 3.22x
- Beta 0.36, yield 0.7%, current ratio 3.22x
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 47.4x)
CASY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs IMKTA's 155.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs IMKTA's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 47.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs IMKTA's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs IMKTA's 0.36 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs CASY's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.2% vs IMKTA's +42.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs IMKTA's 3.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs 5.0% |
IMKTA vs CASY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMKTA vs CASY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMKTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASY is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 3.1x IMKTA's $5.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (CASY) to 1.8% (IMKTA). On growth, IMKTA holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $255M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | $650M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $667M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | +49.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IMKTA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, IMKTA trades at a 66% valuation discount to CASY's 58.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMKTA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CASY's 28.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $31.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $34.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.09x | 58.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.72x | 28.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 9.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.40x | 54.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CASY delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $6 for IMKTA. IMKTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CASY's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMKTA scores 7/9 vs CASY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $177M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $327M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $544M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.50x | 13.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASY five years ago would be worth $39,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,902 for IMKTA. Over the past 12 months, CASY leads with a +84.2% total return vs IMKTA's +42.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.4% vs IMKTA's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.4% | +54.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.6% | +84.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.8% | +275.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.0% | +290.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.9% | +682.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +55.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CASY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASY is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMKTA's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs IMKTA's 92.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.62 | $867.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.09 | $430.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 78.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IMKTA and CASY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, IMKTA offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs CASY's 0.23%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $688.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.65 | $1.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
CASY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IMKTA leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IMKTA vs CASY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMKTA or CASY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMKTA or CASY?
On trailing P/E, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the cheapest at 20.
1x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMKTA or CASY?
Over the past 5 years, Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) delivered a total return of +290. 1%, compared to +39. 0% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CASY returned +682. 6% versus IMKTA's +155. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMKTA or CASY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Ingles Markets, Incorporated's 0. 36β — meaning IMKTA is approximately 23% more volatile than CASY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 84% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMKTA or CASY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -5. 4% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Casey's General Stores, Inc. grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASY leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMKTA or CASY?
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
(CASY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Ingles Markets, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASY leads at 5. 0% versus 2. 2% for IMKTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMKTA leads at 23. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMKTA or CASY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).
08Is IMKTA or CASY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 0. 7% yield, +155. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMKTA: +155. 9%, CASY: +682. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMKTA and CASY?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMKTA (Consumer Defensive) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IMKTA pays a dividend while CASY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CASY vs MUSA
MUSA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CASY.
Compare IMKTA vs VLGEA
VLGEA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to IMKTA.
Expand With WMT + MUSA
WMT and MUSA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.