ING vs DB

For growth investors, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the stronger pick with -8.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 3% for ING Groep N. V. (ING). Deutsche Bank AG (DB) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ING Groep N. V. (ING) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the cheapest at 8.

8x versus ING Groep N. V. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus ING Groep N. V. 's 0. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ING Groep N.

V. (ING) delivered a total return of +173. 1%, compared to +143. 8% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ING returned +228. 3% versus DB's +102. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ING Groep N.

V. (ING) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Deutsche Bank AG's 1. 48β — meaning DB is approximately 30% more volatile than ING relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for ING Groep N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is pulling ahead at -8.

3% versus -65. 3% for ING Groep N. V. (ING). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to 28. 5% for ING Groep N. V.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ING Groep N.

V. (ING) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 5% net margin versus 11. 4% for Deutsche Bank AG — meaning it keeps 27. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ING leads at 39. 7% versus 16. 0% for DB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ING leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus ING Groep N. V. 's 0. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for ING Groep N. V. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ING: -24. 9% to $22. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ING Groep N.

V. (ING) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +228. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ING: +228. 3%, DB: +102. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.