Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IPG vs FORR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
IPG vs FORR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $8.93B | $117M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.21B | $397M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $552M | $-119M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -20.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $72M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.19B | $63M |
IPG vs FORR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Interpublic Gro… (IPG) | 100 | 143.6 | +43.6% |
| Forrester Research,… (FORR) | 100 | 22.7 | -77.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPG vs FORR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth -1.8%, EPS growth -35.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- 45.6% 10Y total return vs FORR's -77.0%
In this particular matchup, FORR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.8% revenue growth vs FORR's -8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 8.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs FORR's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs FORR's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.8% vs FORR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs FORR's -28.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 0.8% |
IPG vs FORR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IPG vs FORR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 25.7x FORR's $397M. IPG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FORR's -30.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $397M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $552M | -$119M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $807M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +64.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | -6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | -79.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FORR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FORR's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IPG's 7.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.9B | $117M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $125M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.43x | -0.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.78x | 7.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | 7.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.77x | 6.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-81 for FORR. FORR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IPG's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPG scores 8/9 vs FORR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | -80.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -28.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.7% | +0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $72M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.90x | -30.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPG five years ago would be worth $9,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,360 for FORR. Over the past 12 months, IPG leads with a +0.8% total return vs FORR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IPG at -8.4% vs FORR's -38.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.8% | -37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | -76.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | -77.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | -38.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IPG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FORR's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IPG currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs FORR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.42 | $11.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.55 | $4.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81.3M | 109K |
Analyst Outlook
IPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IPG as "Hold" and FORR as "Hold". IPG is the only dividend payer here at 5.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.57 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +2.2% |
IPG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FORR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IPG vs FORR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPG or FORR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the stronger pick with -1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG) a "Hold" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPG or FORR?
On forward P/E, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPG or FORR?
Over the past 5 years, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) delivered a total return of -8. 6%, compared to -86. 4% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPG returned +45. 6% versus FORR's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPG or FORR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Forrester Research, Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning FORR is approximately 5% more volatile than IPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 109% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPG or FORR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is pulling ahead at -1. 8% versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. grew EPS -35. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1993. 3% for Forrester Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPG leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPG or FORR?
The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -30. 1% for Forrester Research, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPG leads at 11. 3% versus 0. 5% for FORR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FORR leads at 53. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPG or FORR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 8. 0x for Forrester Research, Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPG or FORR?
In this comparison, IPG (5.
4% yield) pays a dividend. FORR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IPG or FORR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
(IPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPG: +45. 6%, FORR: -77. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPG and FORR?
These companies operate in different sectors (IPG (Communication Services) and FORR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IPG pays a dividend while FORR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.