IVP
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
Personal Products & Services
Market Cap$103K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IVP vs PETS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PETS
PetMed Express, Inc.
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Market Cap$49M
5Y Perf.-75.7%
IVP vs PETS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IVP | PETS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $103K | $49M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $195M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-55M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | -52.2% | -11.1% |
| Total Debt | $16M | $996K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $524K | $55M |
IVP vs PETS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IVP
PETS
| Stock | Aug 23 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspire Veterinary … (IVP) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVP vs PETS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: IVP and PETS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. PetMed Express, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IVP
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
The Income Pick
IVP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.96
- Rev growth -0.5%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 86.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, current ratio 0.25x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PETS
PetMed Express, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PETS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -45.7% 10Y total return vs IVP's -100.0%
- -28.2% margin vs IVP's -76.8%
- 0.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IVP | -0.5% revenue growth vs PETS's -17.2% |
| Quality / Margins | PETS | -28.2% margin vs IVP's -76.8% |
| Stability / Safety | IVP | Beta 0.96 vs PETS's 1.25 |
| Dividends | PETS | 0.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PETS | -34.7% vs IVP's -97.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IVP | -49.9% ROA vs PETS's -54.9%, ROIC -38.8% vs -3.1% |
IVP vs PETS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
IVP vs PETS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPETSLAGGINGIVP
IVPInspire Veterinary Pa…
1leads
PETSPetMed Express, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IVPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
IVP2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PETS6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PETS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IVP and PETS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PETS is the larger business by revenue, generating $195M annually — 12.5x IVP's $16M. PETS is the more profitable business, keeping -28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVP's -76.8%. On growth, IVP holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $195M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.2% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.8% | -28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.9% | -17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | -25.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.7% | -4.7% |
Evenly matched — IVP and PETS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
IVP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102,706 | $49M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -7.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -0.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.12x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
IVP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PETS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PETS delivers a -127.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-128 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IVP. PETS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IVP's 10.48x.
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | -127.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.9% | -54.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.8% | -3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -68.9% | -1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.48x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | -$54M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $523,690 | $55M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $996,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.74x | -73.26x |
PETS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PETS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PETS five years ago would be worth $1,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for IVP. Over the past 12 months, PETS leads with a -34.7% total return vs IVP's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PETS at -41.9% vs IVP's -98.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.7% | -30.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.6% | -34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -80.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -82.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -45.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.4% | -41.9% |
PETS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IVP and PETS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PETS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PETS currently trades 53.5% from its 52-week high vs IVP's 1.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.06 | $4.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.7% | +53.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 82K |
Evenly matched — IVP and PETS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PETS is the only dividend payer here at 0.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | IVPInspire Veterinar… | PETSPetMed Express, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
PETS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IVP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallPetMed Express, Inc. (PETS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IVP vs PETS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVP or PETS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
(IVP) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 2% for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IVP or PETS?
Over the past 5 years, PetMed Express, Inc.
(PETS) delivered a total return of -82. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. (IVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PETS returned -45. 7% versus IVP's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IVP or PETS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
(IVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus PetMed Express, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning PETS is approximately 31% more volatile than IVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IVP or PETS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
(IVP) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -17. 2% for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 18. 9% for PetMed Express, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IVP leads at 86. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IVP or PETS?
PetMed Express, Inc.
(PETS) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 8% net margin versus -86. 0% for Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PETS leads at -0. 7% versus -54. 4% for IVP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PETS leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IVP or PETS?
In this comparison, PETS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. IVP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IVP or PETS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc.
(IVP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IVP: -100. 0%, PETS: -45. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IVP and PETS?
These companies operate in different sectors (IVP (Consumer Cyclical) and PETS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IVP: 6.6% · PETS: -25.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.