Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $13M | $10M | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $33M | $59M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $551K | $3M | $-18M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 25.0% | 4.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 0.4% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | 219.3x | 13.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $92K | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $6M | $12M |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JE Cleantech Holdin… (JCSE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 9.1%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth -93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 61.1%, current ratio 2.55x
CLWT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 7.7% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7%
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 178.6% 10Y total return vs CLWT's 164.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 9.1% yield, vs CLWT's 6.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs CLWT's +8.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.7% |
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories
JCSE leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JCSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PESI is the larger business by revenue, generating $59M annually — 1.8x CLWT's $33M. CLWT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, JCSE holds the edge at -7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $33M | $59M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $292,750 | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $551,000 | $3M | -$18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $691,000 | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +25.0% | +4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +0.4% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +7.7% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +2.1% | -23.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -18.6% | -20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -66.9% | -110.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CLWT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 94% valuation discount to JCSE's 219.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLWT's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JCSE's 22.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $10M | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $4M | $200M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 219.30x | 13.16x | -14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.01x | 7.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 0.62x | 3.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 0.58x | 4.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.72x | 12.27x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CLWT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JCSE's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs PESI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +16.2% | -34.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +12.8% | -20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +2.6% | -21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +2.3% | -16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.01x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$6M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $6M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $92,000 | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.04x | 74.42x | -42.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $361 for JCSE. Over the past 12 months, JCSE leads with a +84.1% total return vs CLWT's +8.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs JCSE's -4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.1% | +4.2% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.1% | +8.7% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.1% | -9.5% | +21.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -28.1% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +164.8% | +178.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | -3.3% | +6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JCSE and CLWT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JCSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLWT currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs JCSE's 43.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.37x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $1.63 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $0.99 | $8.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.6% | +76.7% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 49.5 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 832K | 5K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JCSE and CLWT and PESI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, JCSE offers the higher dividend yield at 9.12% vs CLWT's 6.40%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.1% | +6.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $0.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CLWT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JCSE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JCSE vs CLWT vs PESI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 13.
2x versus JE Cleantech Holdings Limited at 219. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -96. 4% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PESI returned +178. 6% versus JCSE's -96. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 2513% more volatile than JCSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 61% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -93. 7% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, JCSE leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLWT leads at 2. 5% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLWT leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — JCSE or CLWT or PESI?
In this comparison, JCSE (9.
1% yield), CLWT (6. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PESI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is JCSE or CLWT or PESI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 9. 1% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JCSE: -96. 4%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JCSE and CLWT and PESI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JCSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JCSE, CLWT pay a dividend while PESI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.