KRC vs CUZ

For growth investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger pick with 16.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (84. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the cheapest at 15.

1x versus Cousins Properties Incorporated at 111. 6x. On forward P/E, Kilroy Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 84. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) delivered a total return of -8.

5%, compared to -31. 6% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUZ returned +27. 2% versus KRC's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus Kilroy Realty Corporation's 0. 83β — meaning KRC is approximately 3% more volatile than CUZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 86% for Kilroy Realty Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is pulling ahead at 16.

0% versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kilroy Realty Corporation grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CUZ leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

8% net margin versus 4. 1% for Cousins Properties Incorporated — meaning it keeps 24. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRC leads at 28. 4% versus 22. 4% for CUZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRC leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) trades at 84.

8x forward P/E versus 97. 7x for Cousins Properties Incorporated — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUZ: 10. 1% to $29. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 4. 8% for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

80), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUZ: +27. 2%, KRC: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KRC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.