Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGN vs TTEK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
LGN vs TTEK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.77B | $8.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $4.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 102.6x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.70B | $987M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $167M |
Quick Verdict: LGN vs TTEK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 121.2%
- Beta 2.49, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.84x
- 29.9% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7%
TTEK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.8%
- 451.8% 10Y total return vs LGN's 235.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs TTEK's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 102.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs LGN's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs LGN's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TTEK's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +235.3% vs TTEK's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs LGN's 0.4%, ROIC 17.4% vs 3.3% |
LGN vs TTEK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGN vs TTEK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTEK is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 2.3x LGN's $2.1B. TTEK is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGN's 0.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $666M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $669M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TTEK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.3x trailing earnings, TTEK trades at a 97% valuation discount to LGN's 1070.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TTEK's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGN's 37.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $8.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1070.79x | 33.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 102.56x | 20.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.78x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 465.26x | 18.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTEK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +17.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +20.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $987M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.29x | 19.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGN five years ago would be worth $33,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,873 for TTEK. Over the past 12 months, LGN leads with a +235.3% total return vs TTEK's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGN at 49.7% vs TTEK's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +128.9% | -7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +235.3% | +2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +12.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +28.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.3% | +451.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.7% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGN and TTEK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGN's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TTEK's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.29 | $43.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.96 | $29.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +71.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.5 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LGN and TTEK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LGN as "Buy" and TTEK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.8% upside for TTEK (target: $42) vs -27.9% for LGN (target: $74). For income investors, LGN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.90% vs TTEK's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.75 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.96 | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% |
TTEK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LGN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LGN vs TTEK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGN or TTEK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGN or TTEK?
On trailing P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the cheapest at 33. 3x versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock at 1070. 8x. On forward P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGN or TTEK?
Over the past 5 years, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) delivered a total return of +235. 3%, compared to +28. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEK returned +451. 8% versus LGN's +235. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGN or TTEK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock's 2. 49β — meaning LGN is approximately 366% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LGN or TTEK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus 4. 7% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legence Corp. Class A Common stock grew EPS 121. 2% year-over-year, compared to -24. 4% for Tetra Tech, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGN or TTEK?
Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 0. 5% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 2. 8% for LGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGN leads at 20. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGN or TTEK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 102. 6x for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — 82. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEK: 33. 8% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGN or TTEK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 8% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK).
09Is LGN or TTEK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +451. 8% 10Y return). Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +451. 8%, LGN: +235. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGN and TTEK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.