Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LKFN vs SFNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.+46.0%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.13B
5Y Perf.+25.9%

LKFN vs SFNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LKFN logoLKFN
SFNC logoSFNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.62B$3.13B
Revenue (TTM)$422M$627M
Net Income (TTM)$103M$-398M
Gross Margin61.0%5.8%
Operating Margin29.8%-84.2%
Forward P/E14.4x10.5x
Total Debt$184M$641M
Cash & Equiv.$57M$380M

LKFN vs SFNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LKFN
SFNC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Lakeland Financial … (LKFN)100146.0+46.0%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100125.9+25.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LKFN vs SFNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LKFN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Simmons First National Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

LKFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
  • Rev growth -1.9%, EPS growth 10.5%
  • 143.0% 10Y total return vs SFNC's 26.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
  • Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.4x)
  • +17.7% vs LKFN's +8.1%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLKFN logoLKFN-1.9% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueSFNC logoSFNCLower P/E (10.5x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsLKFN logoLKFNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyLKFN logoLKFNBeta 0.79 vs SFNC's 1.02
DividendsLKFN logoLKFN3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)SFNC logoSFNC+17.7% vs LKFN's +8.1%
Efficiency (ROA)LKFN logoLKFNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%

LKFN vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LKFNLakeland Financial Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M

LKFN vs SFNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLKFNLAGGINGSFNC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LKFN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

SFNC and LKFN operate at a comparable scale, with $627M and $422M in trailing revenue. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.

MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$422M$627M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$130M-$497M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$103M-$398M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$104M$755M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+5.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+29.8%-84.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.5%-63.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.6%+71.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.4%+42.1%
LKFN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$3.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.54x-7.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.35x10.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.91x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.85x4.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.11x0.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.65x6.95x
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LKFN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LKFN's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LKFN scores 6/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.2%-11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.6%-9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.8%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$127M$261M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$57M$380M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$184M$641M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.82x-1.01x
LKFN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LKFN five years ago would be worth $10,946 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,512 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, SFNC leads with a +17.7% total return vs LKFN's +8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFNC at 15.7% vs LKFN's 13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.2%+15.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.1%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+47.5%+54.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.5%-14.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+143.0%+26.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.8%+15.7%
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LKFN is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x1.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$69.40$22.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$54.36$17.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.8%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.460.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded154K1.2M
Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LKFN as "Hold" and SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for LKFN (target: $66) vs 5.0% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs LKFN's 3.20%.

MetricLKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$66.00$22.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts109
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises126
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00$0.85
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LKFN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallLakeland Financial Corporat… (LKFN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LKFN vs SFNC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LKFN or SFNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the stronger pick with -1.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LKFN or SFNC?

On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LKFN or SFNC?

Over the past 5 years, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) delivered a total return of +9.

5%, compared to -14. 9% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LKFN returned +143. 0% versus SFNC's +26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LKFN or SFNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

79β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 30% more volatile than LKFN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 24% for Lakeland Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LKFN or SFNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is pulling ahead at -1.

9% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lakeland Financial Corporation grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LKFN or SFNC?

Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

5% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LKFN leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LKFN or SFNC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10.

5x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKFN: 5. 9% to $66. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LKFN or SFNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 2% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN).

09

Is LKFN or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 3. 2% yield, +143. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKFN: +143. 0%, SFNC: +26. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LKFN and SFNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LKFN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LKFN and SFNC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LKFN: -1.9% · SFNC: -56.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.