Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.34B | $14.68B | $3.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.92B | $24.70B | $8.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $517M | $60M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 36.2% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 4.4% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 13.7x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.06B | $8.27B | $5.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $319M | $477M | $3.12B |
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LKQ Corporation (LKQ) | 100 | 104.8 | +4.8% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LKQ vs GPC vs AAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LKQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 77.1%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.90, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.67x
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 21.0x)
GPC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -92.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 43.4% 10Y total return vs LKQ's 4.2%
AAP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +87.8% vs LKQ's -23.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs AAP's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs GPC's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs AAP's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GPC's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs LKQ's -23.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs GPC's 0.3%, ROIC 7.2% vs 8.3% |
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.7B annually — 2.9x AAP's $8.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.7% (LKQ) to 0.2% (GPC). On growth, GPC holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.9B | $24.7B | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $1.6B | $433M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $517M | $60M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $808M | $548M | -$298M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +36.2% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +4.4% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +0.2% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +2.2% | -3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.2% | +6.8% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.3% | -2.1% | +101.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LKQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, LKQ trades at a 95% valuation discount to GPC's 224.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LKQ's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAP's 12.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $14.7B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.1B | $22.5B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.24x | 224.45x | 79.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 13.72x | 20.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.09x | 12.82x | 12.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.60x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 3.31x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.67x | 34.87x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKQ delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for GPC. LKQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAP's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LKQ scores 5/9 vs AAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | +1.3% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +8.3% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +11.2% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 1.86x | 2.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $7.8B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $319M | $477M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $8.3B | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.50x | 1.22x | 1.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPC five years ago would be worth $9,405 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,506 for AAP. Over the past 12 months, AAP leads with a +87.8% total return vs LKQ's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GPC at -12.0% vs AAP's -21.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.2% | -14.1% | +50.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | -6.3% | +87.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.5% | -31.9% | -51.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | -6.0% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +43.4% | -51.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.3% | -12.0% | -21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPC and AAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAP's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAP currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs LKQ's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.74x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.67 | $151.57 | $70.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.23 | $96.08 | $30.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.4% | +69.6% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 42.2 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 1.8M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKQ and GPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKQ as "Buy", GPC as "Hold", AAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.4% upside for LKQ (target: $39) vs 1.2% for AAP (target: $59). For income investors, LKQ offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs AAP's 1.70%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.67 | $141.75 | $58.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 22 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +3.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 37 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $4.05 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LKQ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GPC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LKQ vs GPC vs AAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LKQ or GPC or AAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LKQ Corporation (LKQ) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
On trailing P/E, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Genuine Parts Company at 224. 4x. On forward P/E, LKQ Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
Over the past 5 years, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) delivered a total return of -6.
0%, compared to -64. 9% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPC returned +43. 4% versus AAP's -51. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Advance Auto Parts, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning AAP is approximately 93% more volatile than GPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 2% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -5. 4% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advance Auto Parts, Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -92. 7% for Genuine Parts Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPC leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
4% net margin versus 0. 3% for Genuine Parts Company — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKQ leads at 7. 8% versus 1. 9% for AAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAP leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LKQ or GPC or AAP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LKQ Corporation (LKQ) trades at 9.
5x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKQ: 34. 4% to $38. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LKQ or GPC or AAP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LKQ Corporation (LKQ) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP).
09Is LKQ or GPC or AAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPC: +43. 4%, AAP: -51. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LKQ and GPC and AAP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LKQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GPC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.