Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LMT vs RTX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$118.09B
5Y Perf.+31.9%
RTX
RTX Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$238.07B
5Y Perf.+174.0%

LMT vs RTX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LMT logoLMT
RTX logoRTX
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$118.09B$238.07B
Revenue (TTM)$75.11B$90.37B
Net Income (TTM)$4.79B$7.26B
Gross Margin9.8%20.2%
Operating Margin9.9%10.4%
Forward P/E17.1x25.5x
Total Debt$21.70B$39.51B
Cash & Equiv.$4.12B$7.43B

LMT vs RTXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LMT
RTX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT)100131.9+31.9%
RTX Corporation (RTX)100274.0+174.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LMT vs RTX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LMT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. RTX Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
The Income Pick

LMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 1.09x
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.09x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RTX
RTX Corporation
The Growth Play

RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 39.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
  • 234.7% 10Y total return vs LMT's 156.2%
  • 9.7% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRTX logoRTX9.7% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
ValueLMT logoLMTLower P/E (17.1x vs 25.5x)
Quality / MarginsRTX logoRTX8.0% margin vs LMT's 6.4%
Stability / SafetyLMT logoLMTBeta 0.12 vs RTX's 0.51
DividendsLMT logoLMT2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs RTX's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)RTX logoRTX+40.8% vs LMT's +11.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LMT logoLMT8.0% ROA vs RTX's 4.3%, ROIC 23.9% vs 6.7%

LMT vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
FY 2025
Aeronautics
40.3%$30.3B
Rotary and Mission Systems
23.1%$17.3B
Missiles And Fire Control
19.3%$14.4B
Space
17.4%$13.0B
RTXRTX Corporation
FY 2025
Pratt and Whitney
36.1%$32.9B
Collins Aerospace Systems
33.1%$30.2B
Raytheon Intelligence & Space
30.8%$28.0B

LMT vs RTX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLMTLAGGINGRTX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

RTX and LMT operate at a comparable scale, with $90.4B and $75.1B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.0% (RTX) to 6.4% (LMT). On growth, RTX holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$75.1B$90.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8.7B$13.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.8B$7.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.7B$8.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+9.8%+20.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.9%+10.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%+8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.5%+9.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.3%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.5%+32.5%
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.8x trailing earnings, LMT trades at a 33% valuation discount to RTX's 35.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LMT's 16.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RTX's 21.0x.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
Market CapShares × price$118.1B$238.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$135.7B$270.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.84x35.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.12x25.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.07x20.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.57x2.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.68x3.57x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.09x29.98x
LMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

LMT delivers a 74.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LMT's 3.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs LMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+74.5%+10.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.0%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.9%+6.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.3%+7.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.23x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$17.6B$32.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4.1B$7.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$21.7B$39.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.08x5.58x
LMT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,693 for LMT. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +40.8% total return vs LMT's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RTX at 24.5% vs LMT's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.8%-5.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+11.6%+40.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.2%+93.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.9%+120.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+156.2%+234.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.9%+24.5%
RTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LMT and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RTX's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RTX currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs LMT's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.12x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$692.00$214.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$410.11$126.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.0%+82.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.037.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M5.3M
Evenly matched — LMT and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LMT as "Buy" and RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.2% upside for RTX (target: $225) vs 23.9% for LMT (target: $635). For income investors, LMT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs RTX's 1.49%.

MetricLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…RTX logoRTXRTX Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$635.11$224.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts3726
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises234
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$13.50$2.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.5%+0.0%
LMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). RTX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LMT vs RTX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LMT or RTX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger pick with 9.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (17. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LMT or RTX?

On trailing P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the cheapest at 23.

8x versus RTX Corporation at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LMT or RTX?

Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +120.

1%, compared to +46. 9% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus LMT's +156. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LMT or RTX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus RTX Corporation's 0. 51β — meaning RTX is approximately 312% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 3% for Lockheed Martin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LMT or RTX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RTX Corporation (RTX) is pulling ahead at 9.

7% versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RTX Corporation grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RTX leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LMT or RTX?

RTX Corporation (RTX) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

6% net margin versus 6. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMT leads at 10. 3% versus 10. 0% for RTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RTX leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LMT or RTX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) trades at 17.

1x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for RTX Corporation — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RTX: 27. 2% to $224. 89.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LMT or RTX?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 5% for RTX Corporation (RTX).

09

Is LMT or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, RTX: +234. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LMT and RTX?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RTX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LMT and RTX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LMT: 0.3% · RTX: 8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(LMT: 6.4% · RTX: 8.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LMT: 23.8x · RTX: 35.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.