Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRN vs ALDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LTRN vs ALDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $23M | $104M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-43M |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $244K | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $55M |
LTRN vs ALDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRN vs ALDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.49, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 5.83x
ALDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.28
- EPS growth -46.9%
- -72.1% 10Y total return vs LTRN's -86.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs LTRN's 0.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs LTRN's 2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs LTRN's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.9% vs LTRN's -45.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -55.5% ROA vs LTRN's -97.4%, ROIC -369.4% vs -100.6% |
LTRN vs ALDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LTRN and ALDX operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +48.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LTRN and ALDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $104M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $65M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -1.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LTRN and ALDX each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALDX delivers a -87.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-88 in annual profit, vs $-126 for LTRN. LTRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALDX's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LTRN scores 2/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -126.0% | -87.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -55.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -100.6% | -3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.4% | -56.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $55M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $243,657 | $15M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -21.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LTRN and ALDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALDX five years ago would be worth $1,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,392 for LTRN. Over the past 12 months, ALDX leads with a -19.9% total return vs LTRN's -45.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LTRN at -26.6% vs ALDX's -45.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | -63.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.6% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -83.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -85.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.0% | -72.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.6% | -45.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTRN and ALDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALDX is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTRN's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LTRN currently trades 36.6% from its 52-week high vs ALDX's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.74 | $6.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.6% | +28.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 693K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALDX leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 4 categories are tied.
LTRN vs ALDX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRN or ALDX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LTRN or ALDX?
Over the past 5 years, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) delivered a total return of -85. 6%, compared to -86. 1% for Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALDX returned -72. 1% versus LTRN's -86. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LTRN or ALDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus Lantern Pharma Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning LTRN is approximately 95% more volatile than ALDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 22% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LTRN or ALDX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS -46. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1312. 6% for Lantern Pharma Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LTRN or ALDX?
Lantern Pharma Inc.
(LTRN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LTRN leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for ALDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LTRN leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LTRN or ALDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LTRN or ALDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28)). Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALDX: -72. 1%, LTRN: -86. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LTRN and ALDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.