MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.-57.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MAN vs RHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.-47.1%
MAN vs RHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MAN | RHI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.37B | $2.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.96B | $5.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 16.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.39B | $421M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $871M | $464M |
MAN vs RHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MAN
RHI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAN vs RHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RHI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ManpowerGroup Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Growth Play
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -109.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
- 0.6% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2%
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 20.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
The Income Pick
RHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 8.9%
- 9.6% 10Y total return vs MAN's -31.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 1.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MAN | 0.6% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% |
| Value | MAN | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 20.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | RHI | 2.5% margin vs MAN's -0.1% |
| Stability / Safety | RHI | Beta 0.99 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RHI | 8.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MAN's 4.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAN | -23.8% vs RHI's -33.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RHI | 4.7% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 4.6% vs 5.6% |
MAN vs RHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
MAN vs RHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRHILAGGINGMAN
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
1leads
RHIRobert Half Internati…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MANMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
RHI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MAN5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RHI6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
RHI2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 3.3x RHI's $5.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.5% (RHI) to -0.1% (MAN). On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$161M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +36.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | -39.6% |
RHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RHI's 21.1x.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -102.21x | 20.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.06x | 20.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.91x | 21.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.17x |
MAN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. RHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RHI scores 4/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $871M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $421M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.98x | — |
RHI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MAN and RHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHI five years ago would be worth $4,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,464 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, MAN leads with a -23.8% total return vs RHI's -33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAN at -19.2% vs RHI's -21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.4% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | -33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.3% | -51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.4% | -58.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +9.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.2% | -21.5% |
Evenly matched — MAN and RHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAN and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAN currently trades 62.6% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.34 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.15 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.6% | +55.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.0M |
Evenly matched — MAN and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAN as "Hold" and RHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.6% upside for RHI (target: $41) vs 27.7% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.85% vs MAN's 4.83%.
| Metric | MANManpowerGroup Inc. | RHIRobert Half Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.86 | $40.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | +8.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.43 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +3.4% |
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
RHI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallRobert Half International I… (RHI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MAN vs RHI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAN or RHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAN or RHI?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAN or RHI?
Over the past 5 years, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) delivered a total return of -58. 9%, compared to -65. 4% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHI returned +9. 6% versus MAN's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAN or RHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus ManpowerGroup Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning MAN is approximately 4% more volatile than RHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAN or RHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Robert Half International Inc. grew EPS -45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAN or RHI?
Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHI leads at 1. 4% versus 1. 3% for MAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RHI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAN or RHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Robert Half International Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RHI: 51. 6% to $40. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAN or RHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the highest yield at 8. 9%, versus 4. 8% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN).
09Is MAN or RHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 8. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RHI: +9. 6%, MAN: -31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAN and RHI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MAN: 7.1% · RHI: -5.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.