Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.41B | $2.77B | $349M | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.96B | $5.38B | $3.09B | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $133M | $-266M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 16.7% | 36.8% | 26.3% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 1.4% | -2.8% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 20.8x | 11.0x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.39B | $421M | $159M | $101M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $871M | $464M | $33M | $516M |
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 265.4 | +165.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 16.7x)
RHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 8.7%
- 8.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%
- 4.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 4.6% vs -4.0%
KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HSII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth -84.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs RHI's 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.1% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs RHI's -31.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 4.6% vs -4.0% |
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HSII leads in 4 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • RHI leads 1 • KELYA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 14.8x HSII's $1.2B. HSII is the more profitable business, keeping 3.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.0B | $5.4B | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236M | $150M | -$54M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $133M | -$266M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$161M | $267M | $66M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +36.8% | +26.3% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.4% | -2.8% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +2.5% | -8.6% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +5.0% | +2.1% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -5.8% | -100.0% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.2% | -39.6% | -2.1% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.6x trailing earnings, RHI trades at a 86% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSII's 30.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.8B | $349M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $2.7B | $475M | $812M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.90x | 20.60x | -1.34x | 143.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.28x | 20.76x | 10.96x | 16.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.02x | 21.57x | — | 30.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.52x | 0.08x | 1.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 2.15x | 0.35x | 2.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.39x | 3.06x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSII scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +10.3% | -24.6% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.7% | -11.3% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +4.6% | -4.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +5.0% | -4.3% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.16x | 0.33x | 0.16x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$43M | $126M | -$415M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $871M | $464M | $33M | $516M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $421M | $159M | $101M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.98x | — | -12.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSII five years ago would be worth $14,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +46.2% total return vs RHI's -31.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs RHI's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | +2.4% | +13.1% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -31.4% | -12.2% | +46.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | -49.5% | -34.2% | +145.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | -58.8% | -58.3% | +45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +10.2% | -33.0% | +240.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | -20.4% | -13.0% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HSII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSII is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.99x | 1.01x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.34 | $48.54 | $14.94 | $59.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.15 | $21.84 | $7.98 | $39.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +56.4% | +64.9% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 49.4 | 63.7 | 77.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.9M | 361K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAN as "Hold", RHI as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", HSII as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.67% vs HSII's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.86 | $40.67 | $15.00 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 25 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.7% | +8.7% | +3.2% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 22 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.43 | $2.37 | $0.31 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +3.3% | +3.5% | +0.3% |
HSII leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MAN vs RHI vs KELYA vs HSII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
On trailing P/E, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the cheapest at 20. 6x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
Over the past 5 years, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) delivered a total return of +45. 8%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus KELYA's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus ManpowerGroup Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning MAN is approximately 35% more volatile than HSII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Robert Half International Inc. grew EPS -45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HSII leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHI leads at 1. 4% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RHI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Robert Half International Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 54. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 1. 0% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII).
09Is MAN or RHI or KELYA or HSII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 1. 0% yield, +240. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSII: +240. 0%, MAN: -30. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAN and RHI and KELYA and HSII?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.