Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MCHX vs CDLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
MCHX vs CDLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $63M | $43M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $206M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 63.7% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | -22.8% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $215M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $49M |
MCHX vs CDLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marchex, Inc. (MCHX) | 100 | 103.2 | +3.2% |
| Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCHX vs CDLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCHX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
- Rev growth -3.6%, EPS growth 52.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.5%
- -45.5% 10Y total return vs CDLX's -94.2%
In this particular matchup, CDLX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.6% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -10.4% margin vs CDLX's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs CDLX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.5% vs CDLX's -63.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.6% ROA vs CDLX's -31.5%, ROIC -15.0% vs -18.3% |
MCHX vs CDLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MCHX vs CDLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $206M annually — 4.4x MCHX's $46M. MCHX is the more profitable business, keeping -10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, MCHX holds the edge at -8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $206M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$850,000 | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | -22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | -44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MCHX and CDLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63M | $43M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51M | $210M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.55x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCHX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCHX delivers a -15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-15 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs MCHX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.1% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.6% | -31.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.0% | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | -20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $215M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.24x | -14.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCHX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCHX five years ago would be worth $5,714 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, MCHX leads with a +13.5% total return vs CDLX's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCHX at -4.2% vs CDLX's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | -30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.5% | -63.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | -86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.9% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.5% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.2% | -48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHX currently trades 69.3% from its 52-week high vs CDLX's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 3.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.31 | $3.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $0.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.3% | +23.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MCHX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
MCHX vs CDLX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCHX or CDLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) is the stronger pick with -3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MCHX or CDLX?
Over the past 5 years, Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCHX returned -45. 5% versus CDLX's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MCHX or CDLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 266% more volatile than MCHX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MCHX or CDLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) is pulling ahead at -3. 6% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marchex, Inc. grew EPS 52. 2% year-over-year, compared to 50. 1% for Cardlytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCHX leads at -3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MCHX or CDLX?
Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCHX leads at -9. 2% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHX leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MCHX or CDLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MCHX or CDLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marchex, Inc.
(MCHX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHX: -45. 5%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MCHX and CDLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.