Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Equipment & Services
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $12.38B | $4.50B | $6.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.13B | $0.00 | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-293M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | — | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | — | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 53.9x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $36M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $199M | $340M | $229M |
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 465.2 | +365.2% |
| Akero Therapeutics,… (AKRO) | 100 | 213.8 | +113.8% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 270.6 | +170.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MDGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 37.6% 10Y total return vs AKRO's 198.3%
- 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
AKRO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.35
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 19.38x
- Beta 0.35, current ratio 19.38x
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 5.5% margin vs MDGL's -27.3%
- 6.0% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -55.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs MDGL's -27.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs HIMS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -55.3% |
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MDGL leads 1 • AKRO leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS and AKRO operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDGL's -27.3%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $0 | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$312M | -$318M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$293M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$272M | -$250M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.1% | — | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | — | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.3% | — | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.1% | — | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.8% | — | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +5.7% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MDGL and AKRO and HIMS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $4.5B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $4.2B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.00x | -14.57x | 52.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 53.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 44.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.92x | — | 2.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.09x | 4.89x | 12.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 93.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-50 for MDGL. AKRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIMS scores 4/9 vs AKRO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.2% | -30.6% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.4% | -29.1% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.4% | -55.3% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | -42.4% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.05x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | -$304M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $340M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $36M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.51x | -62.41x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MDGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $42,596 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,724 for AKRO. Over the past 12 months, MDGL leads with a +82.9% total return vs HIMS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 31.4% vs AKRO's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.1% | — | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.9% | +30.1% | -45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.7% | +20.1% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.0% | +107.2% | +150.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3755.2% | +198.3% | +174.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +6.3% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AKRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AKRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AKRO currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.35x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $615.00 | $57.35 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $265.00 | $37.28 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +95.3% | +38.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 70.4 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 312K | 0 | 35.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MDGL as "Buy", AKRO as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for MDGL (target: $706) vs -11.4% for AKRO (target: $48).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $705.67 | $48.40 | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 14 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% |
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MDGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MDGL vs AKRO vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDGL or AKRO or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 59. 0% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 52. 7x trailing P/E (53. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MDGL or AKRO or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +326. 0%, compared to +107. 2% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc. (AKRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +37. 6% versus HIMS's +174. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MDGL or AKRO or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
(AKRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 589% more volatile than AKRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Akero Therapeutics, Inc. (AKRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MDGL or AKRO or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 59. 0% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 41. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MDGL or AKRO or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MDGL or AKRO or HIMS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDGL: 30.
7% to $705. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — MDGL or AKRO or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MDGL or AKRO or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
(AKRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +198. 3% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AKRO: +198. 3%, HIMS: +174. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MDGL and AKRO and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AKRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.