Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MFIN vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
MFIN vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $221M | $819M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $353M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 96.7% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $316M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $104M |
MFIN vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 403.9 | +303.9% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFIN vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 21.1%, EPS growth 17.1%
- 54.5% 10Y total return vs PRAA's -32.6%
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 18.4% vs MFIN's 7.3%
- +56.9% vs MFIN's +8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRAA's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.9% vs MFIN's +8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs PRAA's 0.7% |
MFIN vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MFIN vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 3.5x MFIN's $353M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $353M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.7% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MFIN's 1.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $819M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $336M | $746M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.29x | -2.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.84x | 26.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.89x | 1.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFIN delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFIN's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.2% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $115M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $316M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth $12,232 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,316 for PRAA. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +56.9% total return vs MFIN's +8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 16.1% vs PRAA's -14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | +56.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.7% | -38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | -46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.5% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MFIN and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MFIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs MFIN's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 447K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MFIN as "Hold" and PRAA as "Hold". MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.45 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.4% |
MFIN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
MFIN vs PRAA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFIN or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MFIN or PRAA?
On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MFIN or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to -46. 8% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFIN returned +54. 5% versus PRAA's -32. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MFIN or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 58% more volatile than MFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 62% for Medallion Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MFIN or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus 10. 4% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medallion Financial Corp. grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MFIN or PRAA?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 33. 9% for PRAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MFIN or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for PRA Group, Inc. — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MFIN or PRAA?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PRAA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MFIN or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 8% yield). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +54. 5%, PRAA: -32. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MFIN and PRAA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MFIN pays a dividend while PRAA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.