Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLYS vs CORT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MLYS vs CORT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.00B | $5.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $769M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-152M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 138.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $173M | $120M |
MLYS vs CORT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineralys Therapeut… (MLYS) | 100 | 169.4 | +69.4% |
| Corcept Therapeutic… (CORT) | 100 | 250.4 | +150.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLYS vs CORT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.77
- EPS growth 37.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 43.76x
CORT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.9% 10Y total return vs MLYS's 63.3%
- 6.2% margin vs MLYS's 2.4%
- 5.8% ROA vs MLYS's -27.0%, ROIC 6.2% vs -46.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs CORT's 12.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs MLYS's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs CORT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +108.3% vs CORT's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs MLYS's -27.0%, ROIC 6.2% vs -46.4% |
MLYS vs CORT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLYS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CORT and MLYS operate at a comparable scale, with $769M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $769M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$171M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$152M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$136M | $120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.5% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MLYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.15x | 63.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 138.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 117.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.15x | 9.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CORT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CORT delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-28 for MLYS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CORT scores 5/9 vs MLYS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.9% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.0% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.4% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.7% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$173M | -$114M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $173M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CORT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CORT five years ago would be worth $24,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,334 for MLYS. Over the past 12 months, MLYS leads with a +108.3% total return vs CORT's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CORT at 30.0% vs MLYS's 23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.7% | +36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +108.3% | -26.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.4% | +119.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | +991.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MLYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CORT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLYS currently trades 63.2% from its 52-week high vs CORT's 57.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.65 | $91.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.59 | $28.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.2% | +57.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 75.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MLYS as "Buy" and CORT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.7% upside for MLYS (target: $46) vs 37.4% for CORT (target: $72).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% |
MLYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CORT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
MLYS vs CORT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLYS or CORT a better buy right now?
Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) offers the better valuation at 63.
6x trailing P/E (138. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. (MLYS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLYS or CORT?
Over the past 5 years, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to +63. 3% for Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. (MLYS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CORT returned +991. 0% versus MLYS's +63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLYS or CORT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated's 1. 78β — meaning CORT is approximately 131% more volatile than MLYS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — MLYS or CORT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 37. 4% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLYS or CORT?
Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CORT leads at 5. 9% versus 0. 0% for MLYS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CORT leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MLYS or CORT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLYS: 52.
7% to $46. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MLYS or CORT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MLYS or CORT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc.
(MLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77)). Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLYS: +63. 3%, CORT: +991. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MLYS and CORT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.