Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNSB vs CARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MNSB vs CARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $175M | $580M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $255M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.0% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $105M |
MNSB vs CARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 176.0 | +76.0% |
| Carter Bankshares, … (CARE) | 100 | 370.7 | +270.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNSB vs CARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNSB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66
- 128.0% 10Y total return vs CARE's 111.1%
- NIM 3.1% vs CARE's 2.7%
CARE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 6.2%, EPS growth 32.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 42.5%, current ratio 0.75x
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 0.75x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.2% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CARE's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.4% vs MNSB's +24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CARE's 0.5% |
MNSB vs CARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNSB vs CARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $255M annually — 1.9x MNSB's $136M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.3% (CARE) to 11.5% (MNSB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $255M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $46M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.9% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 29% valuation discount to CARE's 18.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CARE's 16.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $175M | $580M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $653M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.27x | 18.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.38x | 4.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 16.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.46x | 18.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARE delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARE's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +7.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45M | $73M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $179M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | 0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CARE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $18,800 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,864 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +68.4% total return vs MNSB's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARE at 24.8% vs MNSB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +68.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | +94.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.6% | +88.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.0% | +111.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | +24.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARE currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs MNSB's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.17 | $26.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.86 | $15.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 273K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNSB as "Hold" and CARE as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% |
CARE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
MNSB vs CARE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNSB or CARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) is the stronger pick with 6. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNSB or CARE?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Carter Bankshares, Inc. at 18. 7x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNSB or CARE?
Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) delivered a total return of +88. 0%, compared to +18. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +128. 0% versus CARE's +111. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNSB or CARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 18% more volatile than CARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 43% for Carter Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNSB or CARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) is pulling ahead at 6. 2% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 32. 1% for Carter Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNSB or CARE?
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARE leads at 15. 7% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARE leads at 61. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNSB or CARE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNSB or CARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MNSB or CARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carter Bankshares, Inc.
(CARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +111. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CARE: +111. 1%, MNSB: +128. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNSB and CARE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.