Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNSO vs FIVE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.-22.4%
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.

Discount Stores

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.93B
5Y Perf.+75.6%

MNSO vs FIVE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNSO logoMNSO
FIVE logoFIVE
IndustrySpecialty RetailDiscount Stores
Market Cap$4.49B$12.93B
Revenue (TTM)$18.63B$4.76B
Net Income (TTM)$2.35B$359M
Gross Margin45.1%35.0%
Operating Margin18.1%9.6%
Forward P/E1.6x36.7x
Total Debt$3.11B$2.03B
Cash & Equiv.$6.33B$724M

MNSO vs FIVELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNSO
FIVE
StockOct 20May 26Return
MINISO Group Holdin… (MNSO)10077.6-22.4%
Five Below, Inc. (FIVE)100175.6+75.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNSO vs FIVE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNSO leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Five Below, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
The Income Pick

MNSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 121.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FIVE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 485.3% 10Y total return vs MNSO's -18.0%
  • +189.0% vs MNSO's -16.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNSO logoMNSO6.9% revenue growth vs FIVE's 22.9%
ValueMNSO logoMNSOLower P/E (1.6x vs 36.7x)
Quality / MarginsMNSO logoMNSO12.6% margin vs FIVE's 7.5%
Stability / SafetyMNSO logoMNSOBeta 1.24 vs FIVE's 2.02, lower leverage
DividendsMNSO logoMNSO3.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FIVE logoFIVE+189.0% vs MNSO's -16.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSO logoMNSO10.8% ROA vs FIVE's 7.4%, ROIC 44.5% vs 9.9%

MNSO vs FIVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited
FY 2024
- Product sales to franchisees
46.6%$7.9B
- Sales to offline distributors
19.8%$3.4B
- Retail sales in self-operated stores
18.6%$3.2B
- Online sales
5.5%$941M
-Others
4.0%$684M
- Sales-based management and consultation service fees
3.8%$641M
- Sales-based royalties
0.8%$131M
Other (2)
0.9%$145M
FIVEFive Below, Inc.
FY 2025
Leisure
44.5%$2.1B
Fashion And Home
30.9%$1.5B
Party And Snack
24.6%$1.2B

MNSO vs FIVE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMNSOLAGGINGFIVE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MNSO is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 3.9x FIVE's $4.8B. MNSO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIVE's 7.5%.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$18.6B$4.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.3B$650M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.4B$359M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$412M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.1%+35.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.1%+9.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.6%+7.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.3%+8.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.1%+24.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.9%+26.3%
Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, MNSO trades at a 67% valuation discount to FIVE's 36.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSO's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVE's 21.9x.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$12.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.0B$14.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.04x36.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.59x36.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.09x21.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.80x2.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.04x5.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.79x31.42x
MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

MNSO delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $18 for FIVE. MNSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVE's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVE scores 6/9 vs MNSO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+18.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.8%+7.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+44.5%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.5%+11.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3.2B$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6.3B$724M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.65x
MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FIVE five years ago would be worth $12,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,622 for MNSO. Over the past 12 months, FIVE leads with a +189.0% total return vs MNSO's -16.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIVE at 6.0% vs MNSO's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-22.0%+21.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.7%+189.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.3%+19.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.8%+21.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-18.0%+485.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.1%+6.0%
FIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSO is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVE's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIVE currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs MNSO's 55.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x2.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.74$251.63
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.48$80.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.5%+93.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.047.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded449K1.1M
Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates MNSO as "Buy" and FIVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for MNSO (target: $22) vs -6.3% for FIVE (target: $219). MNSO is the only dividend payer here at 3.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMNSO logoMNSOMINISO Group Hold…FIVE logoFIVEFive Below, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.35$219.47
# AnalystsCovering analysts450
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.99
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MNSO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIVE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNSO vs FIVE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNSO or FIVE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger pick with 688.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 9% for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (1. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNSO or FIVE?

On trailing P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the cheapest at 12.

0x versus Five Below, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNSO or FIVE?

Over the past 5 years, Five Below, Inc.

(FIVE) delivered a total return of +21. 7%, compared to -33. 8% for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVE returned +485. 3% versus MNSO's -18. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNSO or FIVE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

24β versus Five Below, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FIVE is approximately 63% more volatile than MNSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 93% for Five Below, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNSO or FIVE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is pulling ahead at 688.

8% versus 22. 9% for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MINISO Group Holding Limited grew EPS 650. 0% year-over-year, compared to 40. 4% for Five Below, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNSO leads at 121. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNSO or FIVE?

MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 7. 5% for Five Below, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSO leads at 19. 5% versus 9. 6% for FIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSO leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNSO or FIVE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) trades at 1.

6x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for Five Below, Inc. — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNSO: 50. 7% to $22. 35.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNSO or FIVE?

In this comparison, MNSO (3.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FIVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MNSO or FIVE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

24), 3. 9% yield). Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSO: -18. 0%, FIVE: +485. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNSO and FIVE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

MNSO pays a dividend while FIVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MNSO

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIVE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNSO and FIVE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNSO: 23.1% · FIVE: 24.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(MNSO: 12.6% · FIVE: 7.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MNSO: 12.0x · FIVE: 36.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.