Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNSO vs FIVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
MNSO vs FIVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $12.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.63B | $4.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.35B | $359M |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 36.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.11B | $2.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.33B | $724M |
MNSO vs FIVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MINISO Group Holdin… (MNSO) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) | 100 | 175.6 | +75.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNSO vs FIVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 121.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 2.04x
FIVE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 485.3% 10Y total return vs MNSO's -18.0%
- +189.0% vs MNSO's -16.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs FIVE's 22.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 36.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs FIVE's 7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs FIVE's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +189.0% vs MNSO's -16.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs FIVE's 7.4%, ROIC 44.5% vs 9.9% |
MNSO vs FIVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNSO vs FIVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSO is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 3.9x FIVE's $4.8B. MNSO is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIVE's 7.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.6B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $650M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.4B | $359M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $412M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +24.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.9% | +26.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, MNSO trades at a 67% valuation discount to FIVE's 36.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSO's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIVE's 21.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $12.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $14.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.04x | 36.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.59x | 36.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.09x | 21.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.80x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.04x | 5.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.79x | 31.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSO delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $18 for FIVE. MNSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVE's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVE scores 6/9 vs MNSO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +44.5% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.5% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.2B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.3B | $724M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.65x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIVE five years ago would be worth $12,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,622 for MNSO. Over the past 12 months, FIVE leads with a +189.0% total return vs MNSO's -16.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIVE at 6.0% vs MNSO's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.0% | +21.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.7% | +189.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.3% | +19.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.8% | +21.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.0% | +485.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSO and FIVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSO is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVE's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIVE currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs MNSO's 55.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.74 | $251.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.48 | $80.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.5% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNSO as "Buy" and FIVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for MNSO (target: $22) vs -6.3% for FIVE (target: $219). MNSO is the only dividend payer here at 3.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.35 | $219.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.99 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
MNSO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIVE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MNSO vs FIVE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNSO or FIVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger pick with 688.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 9% for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (1. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNSO or FIVE?
On trailing P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the cheapest at 12.
0x versus Five Below, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, MINISO Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNSO or FIVE?
Over the past 5 years, Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) delivered a total return of +21. 7%, compared to -33. 8% for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVE returned +485. 3% versus MNSO's -18. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNSO or FIVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
24β versus Five Below, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FIVE is approximately 63% more volatile than MNSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 93% for Five Below, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNSO or FIVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is pulling ahead at 688.
8% versus 22. 9% for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MINISO Group Holding Limited grew EPS 650. 0% year-over-year, compared to 40. 4% for Five Below, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNSO leads at 121. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNSO or FIVE?
MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
4% net margin versus 7. 5% for Five Below, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSO leads at 19. 5% versus 9. 6% for FIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSO leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNSO or FIVE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) trades at 1.
6x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for Five Below, Inc. — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNSO: 50. 7% to $22. 35.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNSO or FIVE?
In this comparison, MNSO (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FIVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNSO or FIVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
24), 3. 9% yield). Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSO: -18. 0%, FIVE: +485. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNSO and FIVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MNSO pays a dividend while FIVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.