Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs IROQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs IROQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $89M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $48M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $73M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $20M |
MOFG vs IROQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs IROQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 2.0%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs IROQ's 59.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 0.29x
IROQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 140.4%
- 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 19.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IROQ's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs IROQ's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs IROQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs IROQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IROQ leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $206M annually — 4.3x IROQ's $48M. IROQ is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $48M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +13.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +115.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IROQ leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $89M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $142M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 19.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 13.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOFG delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for IROQ. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IROQ's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IROQ scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $73M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,561 for IROQ. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs IROQ's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs IROQ's 22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +82.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +25.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and IROQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs IROQ's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $29.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $23.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 44K |
Analyst Outlook
MOFG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, MOFG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs IROQ's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
MOFG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). IROQ leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MOFG vs IROQ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or IROQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or IROQ?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to +25. 6% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOFG returned +109. 8% versus IROQ's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MOFG or IROQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 3578% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 89% for IF Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MOFG or IROQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MOFG or IROQ?
IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IROQ leads at 12. 2% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IROQ leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or IROQ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 5% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ).
07Is MOFG or IROQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MOFG and IROQ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.