Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $89M | $2.35B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $48M | $867M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $5M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 12.2% | 25.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 19.4x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $73M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $20M | $185M | $119M |
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 141.9 | +41.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 246.8 | +146.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
IROQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.1% vs IROQ's 2.3%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 109.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories
MOFG leads 1 • IROQ leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 17.9x IROQ's $48M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $48M | $867M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $7M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $5M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $4M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +12.2% | +25.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +8.9% | +19.5% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +13.5% | +25.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +115.0% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to IROQ's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $89M | $2.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $142M | $2.5B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 19.38x | 13.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | — | 10.80x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.92x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.69x | 10.35x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 1.84x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.02x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 13.65x | 10.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOFG delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for IROQ. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IROQ's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IROQ scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +2.9% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +3.9% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.89x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $53M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $20M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $73M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.26x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,561 for IROQ. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -1.6% | +9.3% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +10.9% | +9.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +82.2% | +54.1% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +59.5% | +102.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +22.1% | +15.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and IROQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs IROQ's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.04x | 0.89x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $29.00 | $46.92 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $23.21 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +91.6% | +96.1% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 34.4 | 57.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 44K | 236K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs IROQ's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | — | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.5% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.41 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
NBTB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus IF Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to +25. 6% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus IROQ's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 3578% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 89% for IF Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 5% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ).
09Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and IROQ and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IROQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.