Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOS vs ICL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
MOS vs ICL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $7.48B | $7.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.68B | $7.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.22B | $369M |
| Gross Margin | 16.5% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $760M | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $277M | $291M |
MOS vs ICL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| ICL Group Ltd (ICL) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOS vs ICL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.32x
ICL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 86.6% 10Y total return vs MOS's 12.7%
- PEG 0.26 vs MOS's 0.93
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs ICL's 4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.93 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.5% margin vs ICL's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ICL's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ICL's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.2% vs MOS's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs ICL's 3.0%, ROIC 6.1% vs 6.3% |
MOS vs ICL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MOS vs ICL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 1.7x ICL's $7.1B. MOS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICL's 5.2%. On growth, ICL holds the edge at +5.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.7B | $7.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$535M | $317M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, MOS trades at a 81% valuation discount to ICL's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MOS offers better value at 0.35x vs ICL's 0.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.5B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.07x | 31.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.13x | 14.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 0.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.69x | 7.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for ICL. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICL's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOS scores 7/9 vs ICL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $483M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $277M | $291M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $760M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.81x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ICL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICL five years ago would be worth $10,767 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,709 for MOS. Over the past 12 months, ICL leads with a -15.2% total return vs MOS's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ICL at 0.5% vs MOS's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.7% | -15.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | +1.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.9% | +7.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.7% | +86.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.6% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOS and ICL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICL's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICL currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs MOS's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.23 | $7.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.74 | $4.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.7M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
MOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOS as "Hold" and ICL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs 9.4% for ICL (target: $6). For income investors, MOS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs ICL's 3.09%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $6.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ICL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MOS vs ICL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOS or ICL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Mosaic Company (MOS) a "Hold" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOS or ICL?
On trailing P/E, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus ICL Group Ltd at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, ICL Group Ltd is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICL Group Ltd wins at 0. 26x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOS or ICL?
Over the past 5 years, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) delivered a total return of +7.
7%, compared to -22. 9% for The Mosaic Company (MOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICL returned +86. 6% versus MOS's +12. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOS or ICL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus ICL Group Ltd's 0. 65β — meaning ICL is approximately 26% more volatile than MOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 44% for ICL Group Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOS or ICL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Mosaic Company (MOS) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, ICL leads at -10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOS or ICL?
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOS leads at 9. 9% versus 9. 8% for ICL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICL leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOS or ICL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for The Mosaic Company — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 32. 6% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOS or ICL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 1% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL).
09Is MOS or ICL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOS: +12. 7%, ICL: +86. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOS and ICL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.