Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NFBK vs FFIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
NFBK vs FFIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $587M | $548M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $251M | $453M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $760M | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $168M | $126M |
NFBK vs FFIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Flushing Financial … (FFIC) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NFBK vs FFIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.31x
FFIC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 25.8% 10Y total return vs NFBK's 19.1%
- Beta 1.08, yield 5.4%, current ratio 3.45x
- NIM 2.5% vs NFBK's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs FFIC's 11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FFIC's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs FFIC's 1.08 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs FFIC's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs NFBK's +30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FFIC's 0.3% |
NFBK vs FFIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NFBK vs FFIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $453M annually — 1.8x NFBK's $251M. NFBK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFIC's 4.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $251M | $453M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | $56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.8% | +107.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NFBK and FFIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, NFBK trades at a 35% valuation discount to FFIC's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFBK's 24.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FFIC's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $587M | $548M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.51x | 29.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.41x | 11.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.18x | 25.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.34x | 1.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.61x | 9.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFBK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFBK delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for FFIC. FFIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIC scores 8/9 vs NFBK's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $592M | $466M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $126M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $760M | $592M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.46x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FFIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFBK five years ago would be worth $9,970 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,596 for FFIC. Over the past 12 months, FFIC leads with a +36.4% total return vs NFBK's +30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FFIC at 23.3% vs NFBK's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.1% | +36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +87.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | -14.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | +25.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NFBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFBK is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIC's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs FFIC's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.21 | $17.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $11.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 261K | 205K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFBK and FFIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NFBK as "Hold" and FFIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for FFIC (target: $17) vs 3.2% for NFBK (target: $15). For income investors, FFIC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.43% vs NFBK's 3.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $16.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.52 | $0.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +0.1% |
NFBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FFIC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NFBK vs FFIC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NFBK or FFIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 1% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NFBK or FFIC?
On trailing P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Flushing Financial Corporation at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NFBK or FFIC?
Over the past 5 years, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) delivered a total return of -0. 3%, compared to -14. 0% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIC returned +25. 8% versus NFBK's +19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NFBK or FFIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Flushing Financial Corporation's 1. 08β — meaning FFIC is approximately 8% more volatile than NFBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NFBK or FFIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 11. 1% for Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flushing Financial Corporation grew EPS 151. 4% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NFBK or FFIC?
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus 4. 2% for Flushing Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFBK leads at 16. 1% versus 7. 6% for FFIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFBK leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NFBK or FFIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Flushing Financial Corporation — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIC: 3. 6% to $16. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NFBK or FFIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 3. 7% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK).
09Is NFBK or FFIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFBK: +19. 1%, FFIC: +25. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NFBK and FFIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.