Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2.63B | $10.44B | $1.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.50B | $6.07B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $609M | $30M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 58.8% | 11.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 16.8% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | 17.7x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $2.71B | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $103M | $17M |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National HealthCare… (NHC) | 100 | 252.6 | +152.6% |
| Encompass Health Co… (EHC) | 100 | 180.3 | +80.3% |
| The Pennant Group, … (PNTG) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NHC vs EHC vs PNTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NHC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.5%
- PEG 0.92 vs PNTG's 2.44
- Lower P/E (21.3x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.44
EHC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 246.0% 10Y total return vs NHC's 195.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 82.8%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.40, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
PNTG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs EHC's 10.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs EHC's 10.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.3x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.44 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs PNTG's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs PNTG's 0.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EHC's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.9% vs EHC's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs PNTG's 3.5%, ROIC 13.9% vs 5.6% |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 5.9x PNTG's $1.0B. EHC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNTG's 3.0%. On growth, PNTG holds the edge at +36.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $6.1B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166M | $1.4B | $66M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $609M | $30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | $172M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +58.8% | +11.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +16.8% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.0% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +2.8% | +4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +9.0% | +36.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +19.6% | +9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NHC and EHC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, EHC trades at a 51% valuation discount to PNTG's 38.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NHC offers better value at 0.96x vs PNTG's 3.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $10.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $13.1B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.09x | 18.95x | 38.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.26x | 17.73x | 24.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.96x | 1.33x | 3.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.67x | 9.45x | 26.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 1.76x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.47x | 3.28x | 3.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.68x | 23.77x | 42.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC delivers a 18.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for PNTG. NHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNTG's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EHC scores 9/9 vs NHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +18.9% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +8.7% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +13.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.6% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.83x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $87M | $2.6B | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $103M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $2.7B | $453M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.41x | 6.54x | 16.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHC five years ago would be worth $25,292 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,279 for PNTG. Over the past 12 months, NHC leads with a +80.9% total return vs EHC's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHC at 46.0% vs EHC's 19.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.4% | -0.9% | +16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.9% | -9.6% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +211.1% | +72.0% | +176.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.9% | +60.0% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.8% | +246.0% | +115.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.0% | +19.8% | +40.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EHC and PNTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNTG's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PNTG currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs EHC's 82.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.40x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $184.08 | $127.99 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $93.54 | $92.77 | $21.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +82.0% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 54.0 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 917K | 240K |
Analyst Outlook
NHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EHC as "Buy", PNTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for EHC (target: $153) vs 19.9% for PNTG (target: $39). For income investors, NHC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.46% vs EHC's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $0.70 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
EHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NHC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NHC or EHC or PNTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 5% for Encompass Health Corporation (EHC). Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
On trailing P/E, Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the cheapest at 19.
0x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. at 38. 7x. On forward P/E, Encompass Health Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: National HealthCare Corporation wins at 0. 92x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
Over the past 5 years, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) delivered a total return of +152.
9%, compared to -17. 2% for The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EHC returned +246. 0% versus PNTG's +115. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 0. 79β — meaning PNTG is approximately 97% more volatile than EHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 121% for The Pennant Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus 10. 5% for Encompass Health Corporation (EHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Encompass Health Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to 17. 5% for National HealthCare Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PNTG leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
5% net margin versus 3. 1% for The Pennant Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EHC leads at 17. 7% versus 5. 4% for PNTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EHC leads at 95. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NHC or EHC or PNTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for The Pennant Group, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EHC: 45. 7% to $153. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NHC or EHC or PNTG?
In this comparison, NHC (1.
5% yield), EHC (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PNTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NHC or EHC or PNTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
40), 0. 7% yield, +246. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EHC: +246. 0%, PNTG: +115. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NHC and EHC and PNTG?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EHC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNTG is a small-cap high-growth stock. NHC, EHC pay a dividend while PNTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.