Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2.66B | $10.66B | $1.24B | $10.18B | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.50B | $6.07B | $1.02B | $5.27B | $5.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $609M | $30M | $363M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 58.8% | 11.1% | 15.2% | 10.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 16.8% | 5.6% | 8.5% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 17.7x | 26.7x | 23.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $2.71B | $453M | $4.15B | $3.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $103M | $17M | $504M | $27M |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National HealthCare… (NHC) | 100 | 281.5 | +181.5% |
| Encompass Health Co… (EHC) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| The Pennant Group, … (PNTG) | 100 | 140.8 | +40.8% |
| The Ensign Group, I… (ENSG) | 100 | 392.2 | +292.2% |
| Select Medical Hold… (SEM) | 100 | 188.8 | +88.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.4%
- PEG 0.93 vs PNTG's 2.66
- +81.9% vs EHC's -8.1%
EHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 82.8%, current ratio 1.08x
- 10.0% margin vs SEM's 2.4%
- Beta 0.40 vs PNTG's 0.79, lower leverage
- 8.7% ROA vs SEM's 2.3%, ROIC 13.9% vs 4.8%
PNTG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1%
ENSG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs NHC's 198.2%
- Beta 0.42, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.42x
SEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.2x)
- 1.5% yield, vs NHC's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs SEM's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs SEM's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs PNTG's 0.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, vs NHC's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.9% vs EHC's -8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SEM's 2.3%, ROIC 13.9% vs 4.8% |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EHC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SEM leads 1 • NHC leads 1 • PNTG leads 0 • ENSG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 5.9x PNTG's $1.0B. EHC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEM's 2.4%. On growth, PNTG holds the edge at +36.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $6.1B | $1.0B | $5.3B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166M | $1.4B | $66M | $558M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $609M | $30M | $363M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | $172M | $47M | $406M | $117M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +58.8% | +11.1% | +15.2% | +10.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +16.8% | +5.6% | +8.5% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.0% | +3.0% | +6.9% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +2.8% | +4.6% | +7.7% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +9.0% | +36.0% | +18.4% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +19.6% | +9.1% | +21.9% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SEM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, SEM trades at a 67% valuation discount to PNTG's 42.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NHC offers better value at 0.97x vs PNTG's 4.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $10.7B | $1.2B | $10.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $13.3B | $1.7B | $13.8B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.35x | 19.35x | 42.54x | 29.85x | 13.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.51x | 17.72x | 26.73x | 23.19x | 13.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.97x | 1.36x | 4.23x | 2.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.85x | 9.61x | 27.97x | 25.71x | 12.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 1.80x | 1.31x | 2.01x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.50x | 3.34x | 3.37x | 4.59x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.89x | 24.26x | 47.16x | 27.46x | 5.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC delivers a 18.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $7 for SEM. NHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENSG's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EHC scores 9/9 vs NHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +18.9% | +8.4% | +16.6% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +8.7% | +3.5% | +6.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +13.9% | +5.6% | +7.0% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.6% | +7.3% | +10.2% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 1.86x | 1.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $87M | $2.6B | $436M | $3.7B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $103M | $17M | $504M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $2.7B | $453M | $4.2B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.41x | 6.54x | 16.52x | 88.33x | 4.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHC five years ago would be worth $26,213 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,886 for SEM. Over the past 12 months, NHC leads with a +81.9% total return vs EHC's -8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHC at 46.5% vs SEM's 2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.9% | +1.1% | +28.4% | +0.3% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.9% | -8.1% | +28.7% | +27.5% | +11.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.6% | +75.4% | +204.1% | +88.9% | +7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.1% | +63.3% | -6.9% | +103.2% | -11.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +252.2% | +136.8% | +752.0% | +158.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.5% | +20.6% | +44.9% | +23.6% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PNTG and ENSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNTG's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PNTG currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs ENSG's 80.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.39x | 0.75x | 0.38x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $184.08 | $127.99 | $35.84 | $218.00 | $16.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $93.54 | $92.77 | $21.73 | $133.81 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +83.7% | +99.7% | +80.0% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 53.6 | 62.5 | 23.3 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 921K | 245K | 358K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NHC and ENSG and SEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EHC as "Buy", PNTG as "Buy", ENSG as "Buy", SEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for EHC (target: $140) vs 9.9% for PNTG (target: $39). For income investors, SEM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs ENSG's 0.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $140.00 | $39.25 | $222.33 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 7 | 13 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.6% | — | +0.1% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $0.70 | — | $0.24 | $0.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +4.9% |
EHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SEM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ENSG vs SEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
On trailing P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) is the cheapest at 13.
9x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Select Medical Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: National HealthCare Corporation wins at 0. 93x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
Over the past 5 years, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) delivered a total return of +162.
1%, compared to -11. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENSG returned +738. 2% versus PNTG's +137. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 0. 75β — meaning PNTG is approximately 99% more volatile than ENSG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 186% for The Ensign Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus 5. 1% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Encompass Health Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PNTG leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
5% net margin versus 2. 7% for Select Medical Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EHC leads at 17. 7% versus 5. 4% for PNTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EHC leads at 95. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 93x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for The Pennant Group, Inc. — 13. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EHC: 30. 6% to $140. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM?
In this comparison, SEM (1.
5% yield), NHC (1. 4% yield), EHC (0. 6% yield), ENSG (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PNTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ENSG or SEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39), 0. 6% yield, +248. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EHC: +248. 9%, PNTG: +137. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NHC and EHC and PNTG and ENSG and SEM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EHC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNTG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENSG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEM is a small-cap deep-value stock. NHC, EHC, SEM pay a dividend while PNTG, ENSG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.