Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NWL vs CHD vs SPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
NWL vs CHD vs SPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $1.97B | $22.49B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.19B | $6.21B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-281M | $733M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 45.1% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 17.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 25.3x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $2.21B | $654M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $409M | $124M |
NWL vs CHD vs SPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 35.2 | -64.8% |
| Church & Dwight Co.… (CHD) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NWL vs CHD vs SPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.2x vs 25.3x)
- 6.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CHD's 1.2%
CHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 1.6%, EPS growth 27.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- 116.4% 10Y total return vs SPB's 13.5%
SPB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 34.3%, current ratio 2.26x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.26x
- +37.8% vs NWL's -1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.6% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs NWL's -3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CHD's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs NWL's -1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs NWL's -2.5%, ROIC 13.9% vs 4.3% |
NWL vs CHD vs SPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NWL vs CHD vs SPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 2.6x SPB's $2.8B. CHD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWL's -3.9%. On growth, CHD holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $6.2B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $696M | $1.3B | $214M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$281M | $733M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $1.1B | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +45.1% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +17.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +11.8% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +17.2% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +0.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | +2.2% | +48.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NWL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, SPB trades at a 30% valuation discount to CHD's 31.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWL's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHD's 18.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $22.5B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $24.3B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.80x | 31.44x | 22.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.24x | 25.30x | 16.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.78x | 18.33x | 11.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 3.63x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 5.80x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.61x | 20.58x | 11.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHD delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-11 for NWL. SPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHD scores 7/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.1% | +17.4% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +8.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +13.9% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +14.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.36x | 0.55x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $1.8B | $531M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $409M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $2.2B | $654M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.01x | 15.59x | 3.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHD five years ago would be worth $11,356 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,510 for NWL. Over the past 12 months, SPB leads with a +37.8% total return vs NWL's -1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPB at 7.1% vs NWL's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.2% | +15.3% | +42.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.7% | +4.4% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | +1.9% | +23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.9% | +13.6% | +2.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +116.4% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +0.6% | +7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHD and SPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHD is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPB currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs NWL's 69.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 0.14x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.64 | $106.04 | $86.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.07 | $81.33 | $49.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +89.6% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 44.0 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 1.9M | 313K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWL and CHD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWL as "Hold", CHD as "Buy", SPB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for NWL (target: $6) vs -0.0% for SPB (target: $85). For income investors, NWL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.20% vs CHD's 1.24%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $99.60 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 34 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +1.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 23 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $1.18 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +16.5% |
CHD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NWL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NWL vs CHD vs SPB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NWL or CHD or SPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger pick with 1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NWL or CHD or SPB?
On trailing P/E, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Newell Brands Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NWL or CHD or SPB?
Over the past 5 years, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) delivered a total return of +13. 6%, compared to -74. 9% for Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHD returned +116. 4% versus NWL's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NWL or CHD or SPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 1276% more volatile than CHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NWL or CHD or SPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is pulling ahead at 1. 6% versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for Newell Brands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHD leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NWL or CHD or SPB?
Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for Newell Brands Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHD leads at 17. 4% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHD leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NWL or CHD or SPB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Newell Brands Inc.
(NWL) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWL: 18. 9% to $5. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NWL or CHD or SPB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. (CHD).
09Is NWL or CHD or SPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Church & Dwight Co.
, Inc. (CHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 1. 2% yield, +116. 4% 10Y return). Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHD: +116. 4%, NWL: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NWL and CHD and SPB?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CHD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.