Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Aerospace & Defense
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $12.78B | $2.22B | $19.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $64M | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-380M | $345M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.8% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.8% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 46.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $0.00 | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $788M | $836M | $503M |
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 790.7 | +690.7% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 155.1 | +55.1% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 233.6 | +133.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OKLO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.12, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 49.08x
- Beta 3.12, current ratio 49.08x
- +177.8% vs SMR's -23.4%
SMR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BWXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs OKLO's 436.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs SMR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs SMR's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs SMR's 3.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.8% vs SMR's -23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SMR's -43.0%, ROIC 10.1% vs -314.7% |
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. BWXT is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -5.9%. On growth, SMR holds the edge at +16.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $64M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$139M | -$627M | $458M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$380M | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$572M | -$584M | $328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.8% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.8% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -9.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.4% | +26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -9.3% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OKLO and SMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.8B | $2.2B | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $1.4B | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -110.58x | -6.24x | 59.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 46.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 49.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.89x | 1.99x | 16.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 66.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-87 for SMR. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWXT scores 5/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | -87.4% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.1% | -43.0% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.7% | -3.1% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.7% | -87.8% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$787M | -$836M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $788M | $836M | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $0 | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 10.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OKLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OKLO five years ago would be worth $53,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,608 for SMR. Over the past 12 months, OKLO leads with a +177.8% total return vs SMR's -23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OKLO at 75.1% vs SMR's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -17.0% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +177.8% | -23.4% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.9% | +69.0% | +235.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.9% | +36.1% | +236.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.9% | +36.1% | +574.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.1% | +19.1% | +49.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BWXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMR's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWXT currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 23.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 3.50x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $193.84 | $57.42 | $241.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.53 | $8.85 | $102.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +23.6% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 50.5 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.9M | 25.9M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OKLO as "Buy", SMR as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for OKLO (target: $115) vs -2.4% for BWXT (target: $210). BWXT is the only dividend payer here at 0.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $114.50 | $18.17 | $210.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
BWXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OKLO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OKLO or SMR or BWXT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) offers the better valuation at 59. 9x trailing P/E (46. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oklo Inc. (OKLO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OKLO or SMR or BWXT?
Over the past 5 years, Oklo Inc.
(OKLO) delivered a total return of +436. 9%, compared to +36. 1% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWXT returned +574. 3% versus SMR's +36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OKLO or SMR or BWXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus NuScale Power Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning SMR is approximately 118% more volatile than BWXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OKLO or SMR or BWXT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -100. 0% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BWX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OKLO or SMR or BWXT?
BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 3% net margin versus -594. 6% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWXT leads at 10. 1% versus -984. 0% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMR leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OKLO or SMR or BWXT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OKLO: 43.
8% to $114. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — OKLO or SMR or BWXT?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. OKLO, SMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is OKLO or SMR or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+574. 3% 10Y return). NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BWXT: +574. 3%, SMR: +36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OKLO and SMR and BWXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (OKLO (Utilities) and SMR (Utilities) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OKLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.