Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OZK vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
OZK vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.34B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.81B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $715M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $464M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $0.00 | $380M |
OZK vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank OZK (OZK) | 100 | 214.9 | +114.9% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OZK vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OZK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 28 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 3.6%
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 0.5%
- 63.6% 10Y total return vs SFNC's 25.2%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- +16.7% vs OZK's +14.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 10.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.7% vs OZK's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
OZK vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OZK vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OZK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OZK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 4.5x SFNC's $627M. OZK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $715M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $732M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.83x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.14x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.21x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.29x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OZK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OZK delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. OZK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFNC's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OZK scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $464M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $0 | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $464M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OZK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OZK five years ago would be worth $12,868 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, SFNC leads with a +16.7% total return vs OZK's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OZK at 17.8% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.7% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.6% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OZK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs OZK's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.66 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.37 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OZK and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OZK as "Hold" and SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for OZK (target: $58) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs OZK's 3.63%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 28 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | 0.0% |
OZK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OZK vs SFNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OZK or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bank OZK (OZK) is the stronger pick with 1.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Bank OZK (OZK) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OZK or SFNC?
On forward P/E, Bank OZK is actually cheaper at 8.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OZK or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Bank OZK (OZK) delivered a total return of +28.
7%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OZK returned +63. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OZK or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank OZK (OZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 3% more volatile than OZK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank OZK (OZK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 19% for Simmons First National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OZK or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank OZK (OZK) is pulling ahead at 1.
1% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank OZK grew EPS 0. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OZK or SFNC?
Bank OZK (OZK) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OZK leads at 33. 3% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OZK leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OZK or SFNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bank OZK (OZK) trades at 8.
1x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Simmons First National Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OZK: 20. 0% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OZK or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 3. 6% for Bank OZK (OZK).
09Is OZK or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank OZK (OZK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OZK: +63. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OZK and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OZK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.