PFS vs OCFC

For growth investors, Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. at 16. 1x. On forward P/E, Provident Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Provident Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) delivered a total return of +7. 9%, compared to +2. 5% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFS returned +61. 9% versus OCFC's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 5% more volatile than PFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 89% versus 98% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Provident Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 112. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 10. 8% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFS leads at 29. 5% versus 14. 1% for OCFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFS leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFS: 11. 3% to $25. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 4. 3% for Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Financial Services, Inc.

(PFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFS: +61. 9%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.